Increase Phase Velocity by Losing Power ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between phase velocity and power loss in waveguides, as described in Snyder's "Optical Waveguide Theory." It states that while phase velocity can exceed the speed of light in the cladding, this occurs only when there is a loss of power to radiation. The participants express confusion about how losing energy correlates with an increase in phase velocity, emphasizing that the power loss results from achieving a high phase velocity rather than causing it. An analogy is made to driving too fast around a bend, where increased speed leads to energy loss. Understanding this relationship is crucial for comprehending waveguide behavior and energy dynamics.
Jeffrey Yang
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I just read some words from the book Optical Waveguide Theory by Snyder, Allan W., p226. It says that

"However, although it is possible for the phase velocity of a mode to exceed the maximum speed of light in the cladding (of waveguide), c/n_cl, this cannot occur without losing power to radiation"

My question is how to understand this? Why losing power can increase the phase velocity of the wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The loss of power is the result of setting up such a high phase velocity wave, it is not the cause of the high velocity.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The loss of power is the result of setting up such a high phase velocity wave, it is not the cause of the high velocity.

Thanks for your reply. I still cannot understand the internal relationship between "losing energy" and "change of phase velocity", could you please explain more about this?
 
If you make the phase velocity too fast, some of the light inevitably escapes.
It's like if you try to drive too fast around a bend you lose some power to skidding... going fast has more energy but you are also losing energy.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top