Index of Refraction & Frequency: Clarifying the Relationship

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between the index of refraction and frequency is clarified: frequency remains constant as light transitions between different media, such as air and glass. This constancy is necessary for the oscillating electric and magnetic fields to remain synchronized at the boundary. While the speed and wavelength of light change, frequency does not, similar to how waves behave in different mediums. Huygens' principle further explains that all light rays reaching a focus take the same amount of time, regardless of their path through varying thicknesses of a lens. This principle underscores fundamental concepts in both physics and optics.
Gear2d
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if someone can clarify the relationship between index of refraction and frequency.

I know that when light is entering into a high index of refraction (say air to glass) that the index is increasing, light bends towards the normal, the speed decreases, and wavelength becomes shorter. But what about frequency, is proportional to the index of refraction (as index increases so does frequency), or is it constant throughout the travel of the light?


Thank You in advance
 
Science news on Phys.org
The frequency stays constant. It has to stay constant in order for the oscillating electric and magnetic fields on the two sides of the boundary to match up properly at the boundary, at all times.

You can see something similar if you tie a light string and a heavier string together, end to end, and send a wave along them. The wave speed and wavelength are different in the two strings, but the frequency is the same, because the ends of the two strings are stuck together so they have to move together at that point.
 
Thanks jtbell, that cleared things up for me. If you do not mind I have one more question. Say you are looking through a lens with the object on the opposite side, and the particles (p1 and p2) emitted from the object reaches the observer at the same time. Say p1 hits the center of the lens where the center is thicker, and p2 hits top end of lens where the thickness is thiner than the center. So would p1 be faster than p2 in order to reach the observer at the same time, or while p1 gets slower, p2 is even slower than p1 (if that physical sense)?
 
According to Huygens principle the time taken is exactly the same.
Each light ray arriving at a focus 'chooses' a path that takes exactly the same time.
So the edge ray goes a further distance through fast air and a shorter distance through slow glass, the centre ray goes a short fast distance and a longer slow distance.
But for them to come to the same focus the times must be the same.

Huygens principle is one of the really clever bits of physics - it hints at relativity and quantum theory from 200 years before Einstein.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top