Index of Refraction of a lens+mirror

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the index of refraction of a converging lens with a reflective silver coating on one side. The lens has a radius of curvature of 18 cm on both sides, and the overall system behaves like a mirror with a focal length of 5.0 cm. The equation used for the calculation is 1/f = (n-1)(1/R1 - 1/R2). There was confusion regarding the radius of curvature for the silver-coated side, as it was mistakenly thought to be 10 cm instead of remaining at 18 cm. The correct index of refraction for the lens material is determined to be 1.4.
Erubus
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The radius of curvature of both sides of a converging lens is 18 cm. One side of the lens is coated with silver so that the inner surface is reflective. When light is incident on the uncoated side it passes through the lens, reflects off the silver coating, and passes back through the lens. The overall effect is that of a mirror with focal length 5.0 cm. What is the index of refraction of the lens material? (Answer 1.4)


Homework Equations



\frac{1}{f}=(n-1)(\frac{1}{R1}-\frac{1}{R2})

The Attempt at a Solution


I plugging in 5cm for f and 18cm for R1. For R2 I thought that because the mirror half of the lens has a focal length of 5cm, that the radius of the the silver coated side would be 10cm. I plug this into R2 however, this is incorrect probably because I'm not clear how the radius of curvature could change for either side, when it is stated at the beginning that both sides are 18cm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
because the mirror half of the lens has a focal length of 5cm, that the radius of the the silver coated side would be 10cm
You appear to have misread the question - the focal length of lens + mirror is 5cm.
The focal length for the mirror side by itself is not 5cm.
 
Got it, thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top