Induced Electric Fields of metal ring

AI Thread Summary
A metal ring placed in a decreasing magnetic field of 1.12 T, which diminishes at a rate of 0.250 T/s, induces an electric field. The calculation for the induced electric field yields a magnitude of approximately 2.8 mN/C. The direction of the induced current, as viewed from the south pole of the magnet, is counterclockwise, opposing the decrease in magnetic flux. The reasoning behind this is that the induced magnetic field must counteract the change in flux, which is decreasing in this scenario. Understanding the relationship between magnetic flux changes and induced currents is crucial for solving such problems.
aznkid310
Messages
106
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A metal ring 4.50 cm in diameter is placed between the north and south poles of large magnets with the plane of its area perpendicular to the magnetic field. These magnets produce an initial uniform field of 1.12 T between them but are gradually pulled apart, causing this field to remain uniform but decrease steadily at 0.250 T/s.

(a) What is the magnitude of the electric field induced in the ring?

(b) In which direction (clockwise or counterclockwise) does the current flow as viewed by someone on the south pole of the magnet?

Homework Equations



Do i need to do anything with the initial B value?

Change in flux dB/dt = -0.25t?

Or is it dB/dt = 1.12 - 0.25t?

The Attempt at a Solution



a) d[phi]/dt = (dB/dt)*Acos(0) = (-0.250)*(pi(2.25*10^-2)^2) = -3.98*10^-4 Wb

E = (1/2r*pi)*(d[phi]/dt) = -2.8*10^-3 N/C

b) Clockwise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi aznkid310,

I don't believe your answer to part b is correct. Can you explain your reasoning for that part?
 
induced emf = - (change in magnetic flux)

Since magnetic flux is decreasing, an induced magnetic field opposite to that must be created to counteract this change in flux. Is my reasoning off?

Also, is part (a) correct?
 
Your answer to part a looks right to me (except they want the magnitude of the field, so you don't need the negative sign).

aznkid310 said:
induced emf = - (change in magnetic flux)

Since magnetic flux is decreasing, an induced magnetic field opposite to that must be created to counteract this change in flux. Is my reasoning off?

Also, is part (a) correct?

The induced magnetic field will be in the direction to oppose the change. Since the magnetic flux from the magnets is decreasing, the induced magnetic field will be in the same direction as the magnet's field. Does that make sense?
 
Ah that makes sense. It would oppose only if the magnetic flux is incresing right?
 
It always opposes the change, so if the magnetic flux is increasing, then yes, the induced field will be in the opposite direction as the external flux.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top