Induced EMF in a small volume of a conductor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of induced EMF in a copper slab subjected to a changing magnetic field. It explores whether the induced EMF is uniformly distributed across the conductor or localized to the area affected by the magnetic field. The participants clarify that induced current and EMF are indeed concentrated in the region where the magnetic field interacts, leading to the formation of eddy currents. Additionally, the relationship between an external voltage source and the induced EMF is examined, confirming they would be in series and oppose each other in a circuit. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of electromagnetic induction in conductors and the implications for circuit design.
PhiowPhi
Messages
203
Reaction score
8
Assume we have the following copper slab, with volume ##V##, and introduced a magnetic field covering a small area of it like so:

RNC1wTP.png

There is change in magnetic flux(##\phi##) due to the magnetic field increasing/decreasing, and via Faraday & Len'z law of electromagnetism, there is an induced EMF(##- \epsilon ##) to oppose that change, and with the conductor's resistance(##r##) an induced current(##I##).

One thing that I'm struggling with, is knowing/understating where the induced EMF is bound to? Is the induced EMF all around the conductor like so:
HsN3nUn.png

Where if I placed a volt-meter anywhere on the top part (A) and the bottom part, the voltage would be the same any point there?
Or , is the induced EMF limited to the area the magnetic field interact's with like so:
7B8O3ho.png

The blue rectangle represents the magnetic field, and r, the resistance of the whole slab.
Likewise, will induced current be focused to that area the magnetic field interacts with, or the entire slab?

One thing I'd like to add, if we introduced and exterior Voltage source to the slab, with the induced EMF, would it be in series?
A5lteD6.png

The total voltage if they we're in a circuit, and they are connected to one another the net-voltage in the circuit would be:

##V_n## = ##V## - ##\epsilon## ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
PhiowPhi said:
Assume we have the following copper slab, with volume VV, and introduced a magnetic field covering a small area of it like so:
If I understand you correct, that some magnetic changing flux, repesented by XXXXXXX, is induced perpendicular through the slab, you will get a circulating emf around the flux:

circulationemf ⋅ ds = dΨ/dt , Ψ is the flux , s is a surrounding path ( the edge of the blue rectangle ).

You will get Eddy-voltage and Eddy-current.
 
Hesch said:
You will get Eddy-voltage and Eddy-current.

If connected to a circuit it would be Eddy voltage & induced voltage(one via circuit and one via the surface of the conductor)?
Also, if there is current running through the conductor from a source(V+) it would be in series and oppose the applied voltage as diagramed in the last image?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top