Induction Proof: Am I on the right track?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a recursive sequence defined by a(1)=a(2)=5 and a(n+1)=a(n)+6a(n-1) for n≥2, with the goal of demonstrating that a(n)=(3^n)-(-2)^n for n≥1 using mathematical induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to verify the base cases and formulate the inductive step by expressing a(n+1) in terms of a(n) and a(n-1), while also checking the validity of their reasoning through calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants have acknowledged the original poster's approach and confirmed that the steps taken appear to be correct, although there is no explicit consensus on the overall validity of the proof yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about their first attempt at an induction proof, indicating a learning context and potential for further clarification on induction techniques.

elizaburlap
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let a(1)=a(2)=5 and a(n+1)=a(n)+6a(n-1), n≥2
Use induction to prove that a(n)=(3^n)-(-2)^n for n≥1

Homework Equations



Not applicable

The Attempt at a Solution



I have check that a(3) = 5+6·5 = 35 = 3^3-(-2)^3 so it holds for n = 3.
The cases n = 1 and n = 2 are similar and also hold

So I assumed that it holds for n and considered

a(n+1) = a(n)+6a(n-1)
= (3^n-(-2)^n)+6(3^(n-1)-(-2)^(n-1))

The second term [6(3^(n-1)-(-2)^(n-1))] equals [2·3^n+3·(-2)^n].

So,

a(n+1) = (3^n-(-2)^n)+(2·3^n+3·(-2)^n)
= 3^(n+1)-(-2)^(n+1)

Is this a valid induction proof? Am I on the right lines here?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi elizaburlap! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 buttons just above the Reply box :wink:)
elizaburlap said:
So I assumed that it holds for n and considered

a(n+1) = a(n)+6a(n-1)
= (3^n-(-2)^n)+6(3^(n-1)-(-2)^(n-1)) …

yes, that's all (difficult to read :wink:, but) fine! :smile:
 
Thank you! This was my first attempt at an induction proof, so I wasn't too sure.

Oh! I see the x2 now, thanks :)
 
Math1115. (:p)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K