Inductive and capacitive reactance

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of inductive and capacitive reactance, specifically addressing why capacitive reactance is subtracted from inductive reactance when calculating overall reactance. The scope includes theoretical explanations and conventions in electrical engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the rationale behind subtracting capacitive reactance from inductive reactance, seeking clarity on the convention used.
  • One participant asks for the formula for capacitive reactance and notes that bringing a term with a j in the denominator to the numerator results in a negative value.
  • Another participant explains that reactances in series add, with inductive reactance having a positive sign and capacitive reactance a negative sign, leading to a net positive or negative result depending on their magnitudes.
  • A later reply mentions that the convention of assigning a negative sign to capacitive reactance and a positive sign to inductive reactance is based on historical decisions related to the phase relationships of current and voltage in capacitors and inductors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement regarding the conventions of reactance, with some seeking clarification while others provide explanations. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the underlying reasons for the conventions used.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the importance of conventions in electrical engineering and the historical context behind them, but does not resolve the foundational questions raised about the nature of reactance.

fonz
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
Why is it that capacitive reactance is subtracted from inductive reactance and not the other way around when determining the overall reactance?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is the formula for capacitive reactance?

With a j in the denominator, the term becomes negative when you bring it to the numerator.

Understand?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonz
fonz said:
Why is it that capacitive reactance is subtracted from inductive reactance and not the other way around when determining the overall reactance?
Reactances in series add. Inductive reactance has a + associated with it, and capacitive reactance has a – associated with it. They keep these signs when you add them, and the result can end up being a net + or a net – depending on the magnitudes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonz
fonz said:
Why is it that capacitive reactance is subtracted from inductive reactance and not the other way around when determining the overall reactance?

Have you been yet introduced to phasor notation?

The answer to your question is "By Convention"
and it's related to the physical facts that
current leads voltage in capacitors
and
current lags voltage in inductors .

So a long long time ago the heavy thinkers {Steinmetz i think it was and Tesla picked right up on it)
decided that capacitance would get the minus sign and inductance the positive sign . Consistency kept their algebra simple. We never changed.

Be rigorous in your arithmetic and form good math habits. It'll pay off.

old jim
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K