Industrial Event Takt Times (production cycle times) and Probability

SSGD
Messages
49
Reaction score
4
Background:

I am a Mechanical Engineer working as an Industrial Engineer. I have collected some data that is the amount of time that an event took to complete. I first assumed it would be normally distributed, but after plotting a histogram and a normal distribution with the data, I doubt that the set follows a normal distribution. So let's do a little thought experiment.

What is the probability of the event taking from -2 to 0 second? I would say it would be zero.
What is the probability of the event taking taking from negative infinity to zero seconds? I would say it would be zero.

So I think it is save to say that the domain of the distribution is from 0 to infinity.

Question:

What are some models tailored for time distribution? I would say a time distribution should have a domain that goes from 0 to infinity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several approaches to this problem, but when the mean is more than a couple standard deviations above zero, there are occasions when the normal distribution still works well even though the values really can only be positive.
 
Yeah the mean and the most probable time are close by looking at the histogram vs the normal distribution, but still about a second or so, which is actually a big issue for this study. We perform a lot of these evenst which last about 8 seconds. So 1 second is about 15% of the total time. I am about 2 to 3 STD from zero. I should plot it and post it. It starts off very close to zero for about 6 sec. Then sharp peak about 7 seconds and a slower decline to zero.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top