Inelastic Collision from different but not opposite directions. HELP

AI Thread Summary
In a completely inelastic collision, two skaters collide and move together post-collision. Alfred, weighing 83 kg and moving east at 6.3 km/hr, collides with another skater weighing 55 kg, moving north at 7.8 km/hr. To find the final velocity after the collision, momentum must be treated as a vector, requiring the use of the equation M1V1 + M2V2 = (M1 + M2)V'. The velocities should be broken down into their respective components due to their different directions. This approach will guide the solution to the problem effectively.
A PP4L K
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two skaters collide and embrace, in a completely inelastic collision. Alfred, whose mass is 83 kg is originally moving east with a speed of 6.3km/hr. The other skater (m=55 kg) is originally moving north with a speed of 7.8km/hr. What is the velocity (magnitude and direction) after the collision?


Homework Equations


1)M1V1 + M2V2 = (M1 + M2)V’
2)F∙Δt = M∙Vf - M∙Vi
3)P = MV
4)Ft = Δp
5)I = MVF - MVi

The Attempt at a Solution


M1= 83kg
V1= 1.75 m/s
M2= 55kg
V2= 2.17 m/s


Honestly I have no idea where to even start. I know how to do regular inelastic, and elastic, collision problems. This is an extra credit problem that I am trying to do, so if anyone could show me how to work one of these out or could hint me in the right direction it would be very much appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay. So you start off with the equation M1V1 + M2V2 = (M1+M2)V'. Treat momentum as a vector and solve for it in components.
 
keep in mind that the velocities of each skater are on different axes
like ben.tien said, use that equation M1V1 + M2V2 = (M1 +M2)V and add the velocities as vectors in components. That should get you on the right path
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top