Inelastic collision with an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
A particle thrown upward at 10√3 m/s collides perfectly inelastically with an inclined plane, leading to a discussion on the maximum height attained post-collision. The initial calculations suggest a height of 9 m, but the correct maximum height is determined to be 6 m after considering the effects of gravity and the collision dynamics. The conversation clarifies that, despite the inelastic nature of the collision, the particle behaves like a projectile after the initial impact. Participants emphasize that the velocities of the colliding objects are equal immediately after the collision, allowing for further upward motion until the particle reaches its peak. The final consensus is that the total height above ground is 6 m, integrating both the height of the incline and the additional vertical displacement.
Vinita
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle is thrown upward with speed 10√3 m/sec. It strikes an inclined surface. Collision between the particle and inclined plane is perfectly inelastic. What will be the maximum height attained by the particle from the ground.
physics (2).jpg


2. Relevant information and equations
  • In perfectly inelastic collision (e=0) colliding objects stick to each other.
  • When net F external = 0, momentum is conserved.
  • v2 = u2 + 2as (for constant acceleration a)

The Attempt at a Solution


Just before collision let velocity of particle be v
⇒ v2 = (10√3)2 - 2g(3)
⇒ v = 4√15 m/s (g=10 m/s2

Let m = mass of particle, M = mass of surface, V = velocity of particle and surface along the normal.

Along the normal,
∫Ndt = m(V-vcos45°) = MV
⇒V = mv/√2(m-M)
Since denominator is very large, V≈ 0

Now component of velocity along the inclined plane ( = vsin45°) will not change as the normal reaction (which will give the impulse during collision) is acting to perpendicular to it.

So finally particle will move along the incline particle( upwards) till its velocity becomes zero.
0 = (vsin45°)2 - 2s(gsin45°)
⇒ s = 6√2

Thus, total height above ground = s(sin45°) + 3 = 9 m
But the answer is 6 m.
Is it because I neglected the velocity along the normal?
 

Attachments

  • physics (2).jpg
    physics (2).jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 1,663
Physics news on Phys.org
Vinita said:
In perfectly inelastic collision (e=0) colliding objects stick to each other.
That is only true for head on collisions.
Vinita said:
So finally particle will move along the incline
It will move that way immediately after impact, but there is no glue holding it to the ceiling.
 
haruspex said:
That is only true for head on collisions.
But they will still move together along the normal, right? Because velocity of separation = 0
haruspex said:
It will move that way immediately after impact, but there is no glue holding it to the ceiling
So, will it be like a projectile?
I don't understand how that's possible if the surface and ball are moving together along normal. What does perfectly inelastic collision signify here?
 
Vinita said:
But they will still move together along the normal, right?
Only at first.
Vinita said:
So, will it be like a projectile?
Yes.
Vinita said:
What does perfectly inelastic collision signify here?
That immediately after collision the velocities are the same in the direction of the impulse, so zero in this case.
Gravity continues to act, and its component in the direction of impulse is away from the ceiling, so the particle will separate from it.
 
haruspex said:
Only at first.
Okay I get it now.
At maximum height, velocity along y-axis = 0
⇒ 0 = (v/2)2 - 2gs
⇒ s = 3 m
Total height above ground = 3 +3 = 6 m
Thanks you for helping me.:smile:
 
Vinita said:
Okay I get it now.
At maximum height, velocity along y-axis = 0
⇒ 0 = (v/2)2 - 2gs
⇒ s = 3 m
Total height above ground = 3 +3 = 6 m
Thanks you for helping me.:smile:
You are welcome.
 
Just to interject that you really do not need to solve the parabolic motion to solve the problem. You can just equate the difference in potential energy to the loss of the contribution of the y-component of velocity to kinetic energy.
 
  • Like
Likes haruspex
Orodruin said:
Just to interject that you really do not need to solve the parabolic motion to solve the problem. You can just equate the difference in potential energy to the loss of the contribution of the y-component of velocity to kinetic energy.
Yeah, I didn't think of that. Thank you.
 
Back
Top