Inequality involving abs. value of complex-valued multiple integral

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the inequality involving the absolute value of a complex-valued multiple integral, specifically showing that for a nonnegative integer k, the expression \(0 \leq \Re(s) + k\) leads to the inequality \(\left| (s)_k \int_0^1 \cdots \int_0^1 (n+x_1+\cdots+x_k)^{-s-k}\, dx_1 \cdots dx_k \right| \leq |(s)_k|n^{-\Re(s) - k}\). The Pochhammer symbol \((s)_k\) is defined as \(s(s+1)\cdots(s+k-1)\). The user also references a previously proven result involving the forward difference operator \(\Delta\) and its application to the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, specifically real and imaginary parts of complex numbers.
  • Familiarity with the Pochhammer symbol and its properties.
  • Knowledge of multiple integrals and their evaluation techniques.
  • Experience with the forward difference operator and its applications in calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the Pochhammer symbol in complex analysis.
  • Learn about the forward difference operator and its role in numerical analysis.
  • Explore techniques for evaluating multiple integrals, particularly in the context of complex variables.
  • Investigate inequalities in complex analysis, focusing on bounds involving integrals and series.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, integral calculus, and numerical methods, will benefit from this discussion. It is also relevant for researchers exploring inequalities in mathematical analysis.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
How do I show that

[tex]0\leq \Re (s) +k\Rightarrow\left| (s)_k \int_0^1\cdots\int_0^1 (n+x_1+\cdots +x_k)^{-s-k}\, dx_1\cdots\, dx_k \right| \leq |(s)_k|n^{-\Re (s) -k}[/tex]​

where k is a nongegative integer and [tex](s)_k:=s(s+1)\cdots (s+k-1)[/tex] is the Pochammer symbol (aka the rising factorial) ?

If it helps, I know (and have previously proven) that

[tex](s)_k\int_0^1\cdots\int_0^1 (n+x_1+\cdots +x_k)^{-s-k}\, dx_1\cdots\, dx_k = \sum_{m=0}^{k}(-1)^{m} \left(\begin{array}{c}k\\m\end{array}\right) (n+m)^{-s} =: \Delta ^k (n^{-s})[/tex]​

where [tex]\Delta[/tex] is the forward difference operator.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need your previous work, just use the simplest upper bound for your integral you can think of.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K