Inequality Notation: What Does it Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter j.gal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
j.gal
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was reading on inequalities and encountered a notation i haven't come across before.
an image of it is added to this post as an attachment.
 

Attachments

  • review125.png
    review125.png
    209 bytes · Views: 498
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you mean the dots, it is simply a different way of expressing multiplication.

so that is the same as

(a)(c) > (b)(c)
 
one other question i have.
Does Pythagorean theorem still work if you use elliptical geometry?
 
No, the Pythagorean theorem is in fact equivalent to the parallel postulate. So it doesn't work in elliptical geometry.

There are however generalizations of Pythagoras which do hold in non-Euclidean geometry. More information can be found on wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top