Inertia and equlibrium of machines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of equilibrium in machines, particularly how inertia forces and torques relate to this state. It highlights confusion around the application of Newton's second law and the conditions under which a machine part is considered in equilibrium. The key equations discussed include the relationship between mechanical torque, electromagnetic torque, and friction. It is clarified that equilibrium occurs when there is no acceleration, meaning the net forces acting on the machine part balance out. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately analyzing machine behavior and ensuring proper functioning.
ahmedbadr
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
well, i would like to ask abt sth we studied in theory of machines ' we studied chapter named(equilibrium of machines) but i am really so confused abt concept of this equilibrium
because in this chapter we have studied that any part of machines under equlibrium
u can apply these equations to it
(1)f=ma
where f is inertia force
(2)inertia torque=mass x angular acceleration
and i think for any object under any forces u can apply Newton's second law on it
total forces= ma where (ma is the inertia force) so i understand from this equation that this part of machine comes to equilibrium due to its inertia force
well,my question here is that every object is under inertia force when some forces acts on it so any part of machine will be in equilibrium even without calculations i know this maybe wrong but i can't find interpretation

this maybe because i have misunderstanding abt concept of equilibrium like sometimes iam asking when part of machine not in equilibrium ?what happens to it if it's not in?sth like that
or maybe i ve problem abt concept of inertia force or inertia torque

but really i am so confused abt the equations above every object or every part of machine will be in equlibrium ?even without calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had a bit of a hard time understanding your post. If you could re-write it without so many short handed works and better structure I could probably better understand what your asking. Anyways, I'm going to assume that you are confused about how the torque on a electrical machine is calculated. A simple model use for the armature for most machines is:

Tm = Te + fw + Ja

Where:
Tm = mechanical torque
Te = electromagnetic torque
f = friction coefficient (not always linear)
J = moment of inertia
a = acceleration

If an equilibirum state is obtained that usually means that there is no acceleration of the armature (a = 0). Because of this the only forces acting on the armature are the loading torque (Tm), the electromagnetic torque (Te) and the force of friction (fw). In other words, in equilibrium

Tm = Te + fw
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top