B Infinite Curvature & Hawking Radiation Explained

Castty
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

i have a question which i can't solve myself, as i am not a student of physics:

I have heard of the infinite space curvature which occurs when matter collapses into a black hole.

On the other hand i have heard, that a black hole radiates energy away.

Now i see a contradiction: When the space curvature has a value that is infinite, how can u substract an finite value from it so that the curvature flattens out in the end? Is my understanding of infinite in that sense wrong? Thats must be, otherwise, due to hawking radiation, we would have "nacked" space curvature without mass.

Id be glad, if someone could help me out here.

Thanks and regards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hawking radiation comes from the spacetime at the event horizon, where the curvature is finite.

The infinite curvature that you’re thinking about is at the singularity at the “center” of the black hole.
 
Thanks for the answer but i read, that a black hole will radiate completely away in a far far far future. If that's true, then someday even the singularity must be touched by this. Thats why my questions raised.
 
Castty said:
the infinite space curvature which occurs when matter collapses into a black hole

At the singularity at ##r = 0##, yes, as @Nugatory has said. More precisely, this is a prediction of classical General Relativity.

Castty said:
i have heard, that a black hole radiates energy away

Yes, but that prediction is not a prediction of classical General Relativity. It is a prediction of quantum field theory in curved spacetime, which is the best we have done so far at combining quantum field theory with General Relativity. But that theory is still incomplete, and when we have a full quantum theory of gravity, it might also change the prediction of what happens inside a black hole so there is no longer infinite curvature at ##r = 0##. We don't know for sure because we don't have a full quantum theory of gravity yet.

Castty said:
When the space curvature has a value that is infinite, how can u substract an finite value from it so that the curvature flattens out in the end?

In the quantum field theory in curved spacetime model that predicts that black holes radiate (more precisely, the original model that Hawking came up with in the 1970s), the curvature does not "flatten out" inside the hole. When we say the hole radiates away, what we really mean is that the region of spacetime inside the event horizon, which has a singularity at ##r = 0##, ends up becoming disconnected from the region of spacetime outside the event horizon. But the region containing the singularity is still part of the overall spacetime, even though it ends up disconnected from the outside region. So the curvature at the singularity never has to "flatten out".

I should emphasize, though, that we don't know whether this original model of Hawking's is what actually happens. It's a mathematical model that may or may not reflect reality. There are other, different proposed mathematical models that make different predictions, but as I said, until we have a complete quantum theory of gravity, we won't know which, if any, of the models we have now describe what actually happens.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and PeroK
Thanks for the answer! That helps alot. Exciting topic. Studied the wrong subject :)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top