Infinite Square Well Frequency of Oscillation

Blitzmeister
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a particle in an infinite square well potential that has the initial wave-function:
Ψ(x,0) = (1/√2) [Ψ_1(x) + Ψ_2(x)]

where Ψ_1(x) and Ψ_2(x) are the ground and first excited state wavefunctions. We notice that <x> oscillates in time. FIND the frequency of oscillation

Homework Equations


So,
<x> = expected value integral over 0 to L
Ψ_1(x) = √(2/L) sin(πx/L)e^(-iE/ћt)
Ψ_2(x) = √(2/L) sin(2πx/L)e^(-iE/ћt)

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved:
<x> = [(1/2)-(16/(9π^2))]L
(Not only did I do this by hand but I also checked it against mathematica so this is definitely not wrong)
Real question is, WHAT is the frequency of oscillation actually? I have NO idea what the question is asking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happened to the exponential time factors. Hint: E is not the same in Ψ_1 and Ψ_2.
 
Ah so they are different. Okay so what I did, which I guess is wrong was cancel the two exponential time factors since they were e^(-iEt/hbar) and e^(-iEt/hbar)
In that case then still, what exactly is the oscillating frequency? omega?
 
Last edited:
Right, the time factors are different and so they won't cancel. You should recalculate <x>. You will get a time dependence from which you can deduce the oscillation frequency.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top