Infinitely Many Turning Points: A Study of the Functions Re(t^i) and Im(t^i)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ben297
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points Turning
ben297
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Considering the function

f(t) = Re(t^i) where i is the imaginary unit

How many turning points exist between t=0 and t=1?

Similarly, considering the parametric function

x(t) = Re(t^i)
y(t) = Im(t^i)

(which appears to trace out a unit circle), how many revolutions does this make between t=0 and t=1?

I cannot answer either of these questions with any certainty. However, I've been graphing them using Mathematica, and based on that, the answer to both questions appears to be infinitely many.

I'd appreciate any comments or explanations, or any recommended reading.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I was able to prove that over the domain

0 < t < a

Re(t^i) and Im(t^i) both have infinitely many turning points. a can be any positive real number of any magnitude. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top