Infrared spectroscopy to find water absorption lines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using a Michelson interferometer and an ocean spectrometer to identify water absorption lines in the infrared spectrum. The original poster seeks clarification on integrating the obtained spectrum and applying Fourier transforms to identify absorption peaks. A suggestion is made to utilize Beer-Lambert's law for calculating absorbance, which relates the input and output power spectra of light passing through water. The conversation emphasizes the need to measure both the spectrum after passing through water and the initial spectrum to effectively apply the law. Additionally, increasing the path length of light through water may enhance the observable absorption if it is too weak.
bertopolis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi I am currently trying to find the water absorption lines by using a Michelson interferometer, as a detector I am using an ocean spectrometer. The data obtained is thus the spectrum's "received" by the spectrometer. Am I right to assume that in order to find the absorption peak/peaks I should integrate the spectrum's obtained (between 700 and 1000nm), the plot of these would be a signal graph, which once this is Fourier transformed should give me the absorption lines? I am currently doing this using python and the results obtained are very misleading and unclear. The Fourier Transform's obtained will be attached to this post.
Thanks for any help
 

Attachments

  • againcrap.png
    againcrap.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 589
  • fftwierd.png
    fftwierd.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 598
  • otherfirst.png
    otherfirst.png
    2 KB · Views: 631
Science news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with the method you described there, did you read this from certain literature or were you told by someone?
Anyway why not using Beer-Lambert's law? From this you can get absorbance.
 
I did this due to equipment limitations, I haven't heard of this law, and I don't exactly understand how it works. Could you please explain this?
 
You have basically everything to make use of this equation because what you need is just a spectrometer. Beer-Lambert law states that ## I(\omega,L) = I(\omega,0) e^{-a(\lambda)L} ## where ## I(\omega,L) ## and ## I(\omega,0) ## are the power spectrum (spectrometer signal) of the output and input light beam respectively, and L is the medium length (in this case the distance traveled in the water). The absorbance is defined as ## a(\lambda)L ##. So if you know both power spectra you can get the absorbance.

However remember that what you get from that calculation is the absorbance, which slightly different from absorption spectrum. They are equal only for small absorption, but if what you interested in is just the absorption peaks, this method should work.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bertopolis
That's brilliant and extremely helpful, thanks. SO does that mean the values I have from the spectrometer is I(w,z)-I(w,0) ? Is there anyway I could reach this equation from the values I have already obtained?
 
You get I(w,L) from measuring the spectrum of the light you are using after it has passed through the water. While I(w,0) is the spectrum of your light source itself, that is the spectrum you get by placing the spectrometer directly in front your light source, with nothing in between. From this ## I(\omega,L) = I(\omega,0) e^{-a(\lambda)L} ##, I suppose you know how to extract ## a(\lambda)L ##.
I don't know how strong the absorption of water within infrared region is, but in case you notice that the absorption is too weak to observe you can try to increase L.
 
  • Like
Likes bertopolis
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top