Inhomogeneous Wave Equation: How to Solve using Separation of Variables?

ARTjoMS
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
u''tt=a^2*u''xx + t*x 0<x<l; t>0

u(0,t)=u(l,t)=0
u(x,0)=u't(x,0)=0

http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/en/solutions/lpde/lpde202.pdf

^^Here i found how to solve this problem using Green's function, however i am told to solve this using the method of separation of variables. But i cannot find any theory or examples for inhomogeneous wave equation.

Please help me.
Thank you!:smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well normally when you do separation of variables you let:

u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)

How about trying other expressions with the variables separated. For example, try:

u(x,t)=xX(x)tT(t)

or:

u(x,t)=\frac{XT}{xt}

or:

u(x,t)=\frac{xt}{XT}
 
In general separation of variables applies to homogeneous problems, and you have a "forcing term" (t*x in your example). Sometimes you can be clever and muck with your original problem to place it in a form suitable for separations of variables directly, but I don't know of any general procedure for doing this.

The usual procedure, at least for "nice" equations like the wave equation, is to use separation of variables on the homogeneous problem in order to find the natural eigenfunctions. One then expands both the solution and the forcing term in those eigenfunctions, and solve for the resulting coefficients.

Another approach for this problem is to use the method of characteristics, leading to the well-known solution known as the d'Alembert solution.

good luck,

jason
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top