Inifinte integers between each interval of time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of infinite real numbers existing between any two time intervals, questioning how we can perceive time as constant despite this infinity. Participants reference Zeno's paradox, particularly the Achilles and the tortoise scenario, to illustrate the challenges of understanding motion and time. They explain that an infinite series can converge to a finite value, allowing for the passage of infinite fractions of time within a finite duration. The analogy of a clock's second hand demonstrates how movement occurs despite the infinite divisions of time. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping the underlying concepts rather than getting bogged down by complex calculus.
Gurglas
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys!
I am new here, and would like to ask a question that has been on my mind for a very long time. I've searched on the internet to find a solution to this question, but have come up with nothing, so I searched for a physics forum which could possibly put my question to rest.

Here it is:

Between each interval of time, there is an infinite amount of reals between them.

e.g. between 1s and 2s, (1.1s, 1.2s, 1.3s, 1.4s... 2s).
even between 1.1s, and 1.2s, (1.1s, 1.12s, 1.13s, 1.14s...1.2s)
even between 1.1s, and 1.11s (1.101s, 1.102s, 1.103s...1.1s)
and so on.

So technically between each interval of time, there has to also be an infinite amount of reals that will never be reached.

But then how can we ever even reach 2 seconds from 1 second?

How is it possible then that we perceive time as being constant, regardless of relativity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1] The integers are 1,2,3,4... etc.
1.5 is not an integer
The number of integers between 1 and 2 is zero.

You mean the reals: 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3...2] Read up on Zeno's paradoxes. He had similar troubles. Look at Achilles and the tortoise. It was not resolved satisfactorily until more modern times.
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
1] The integers are 1,2,3,4... you mean the reals: 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3...
2] Read up on Zeno's paradox.

Sorry, I thought that was an integer :P lol

I've read about it, but that has to do with distances. How can we perceive time as constant if there are an infinite amount of "reals" between each interval?

thats my real question
 
Gurglas said:
Sorry, I thought that was an integer :P lol

I've read about it, but that has to do with distances. How can we perceive time as constant if there are an infinite amount of "reals" between each interval?

thats my real question

Also read up on convergent series.

An infinite set of numbers can add up to a finite number.

1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32 + ... = 1

If you look at these number as fractions of a second, you can see how an infinite number of fractions of a second can pass in a finite amount of time.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Also read up on convergent series.

An infinite set of numbers can add up to a finite number.

1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32 + ... = 1

If you look at these number as fractions of a second, you can see how an infinite number of fractions of a second can pass in a finite amount of time.

Thanks, unfortunately my calculus is limited to just second year uni, so it's a bit over my head :(
 
Gurglas said:
I've read about it, but that has to do with distances. How can we perceive time as constant if there are an infinite amount of "reals" between each interval?

They're really the same problem. Imagine applying Zeno's paradox to the sweep seconds hand of an analog clock/watch: In five seconds the hand will move from one number to the next... But after 2.5 seconds it's only half-way there, and then it takes 1.25 seconds to cover half the remaining distance, and then .625 seconds to cover half the still-remaining distance... and because there are an infinite number of reals in between, there are an infinite number of steps to take, each one requiring some time. So how does the hand ever get there?
 
Gurglas said:
Thanks, unfortunately my calculus is limited to just second year uni, so it's a bit over my head :(

It's over my head too. :smile:

Unless you're looking for rigorous proofs, don't worry about the calculus. Just look at the concepts.
 
Back
Top