Initial Compressed Spring Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the initial force exerted by a compressed spring on a block. Given the spring's relaxed length of 0.17 m and a compression to 0.11 m, the calculated force using the spring constant of 15 N/m yields 0.9 N. However, there is debate about the accuracy of significant digits in the calculation, with suggestions that multiplying before subtracting could yield a more precise result. Additionally, the importance of indicating directionality in the answer is raised, with a suggestion to express the force as a vector. The conversation highlights the nuances of significant figures and vector representation in physics problems.
Cpt. DeMorgan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spring has a relaxed length of 0.17 m, and its stiffness is 15 N/m. The spring sits vertically on a table. You place a block of mass 0.058 kg on the spring and push down on the block until the spring is only 0.11 m long. You hold the block motionless on the compressed spring, then remove your hand.

At the instant you release the block, what is the force exerted by the spring on the block? (Consider the initial stretch of the spring.) Use the usual axis system, with the +y axis running vertically up.

L=0.11m
L0=0.17m
Ks=15N/m

Homework Equations



|s|(absolute value of s)=|L-L0|

|Fspring|(magnitude of the force) = Ks*|s|

The Attempt at a Solution



I am asked to find the force exerted by the spring initially. I plugged in the variables I was given.

|s| = |0.11m-0.17m|
|s| = 0.06m

|Fspring| = 15N/m*0.06m
|Fspring| = 0.9N

So my answer for the force acted on the block initially by the spring was 0.9N. However, I am told this is not right. Can anyone explain why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method looks right. Are you being penalized for not enough SDs? You can get an extra SD by multiplying before subtracting.

[great user name, btw :) ]
 
lewando said:
Your method looks right. Are you being penalized for not enough SDs? You can get an extra SD by multiplying before subtracting.

[great user name, btw :) ]
I think not.

15(0.17-0.11) = 15(0.17) - 15(0.11)

             = 2.55 - 1.65

Each of which is accurate to the nearest tenth (according to SigDig). So while each of these has 2 SigDig, when you subtract you're left with 1 SigDig.

However, if you multiply both lengths, 0.17 & 0.11, by 2.0000, before subtracting, the result will have 2 SigDig. Then if you multiply by 15 followed by division by 2.0000, the result will have 2 SigDig, showing the folly of being too rigid about applying the rules of SigDig.

Alternatively, if you look at the question, there does appear to be an emphasis on directionality. Should the answer of a magnitude be accompanied by a direction?
 
Are you being penalized for not enough SDs?

I don't think my professor is that strict with SDs. It is possible though.

Should the answer of a magnitude be accompanied by a direction?

This is possible but isn't it implied to be going up the y-axis since it is a positive number? Maybe I should have wrote it as a vector: <0,0.9,0>N?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top