Inner and Outer Spacewhere does it begin, your opinion.

  • Thread starter Thread starter waterwalker10
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on defining the boundaries of "inner" and "outer" space, with opinions varying on whether these begin at 100 km above Earth or at the point where the atmosphere becomes a vacuum. Some participants argue that inner space is defined by Earth's gravitational pull, while outer space is where this pull diminishes. There is no universally accepted boundary, as NASA defines space at 100 km, but others suggest 130 km is more appropriate for achieving temporary orbit. The term "inner space" historically referred to underwater environments, complicating the discussion. Ultimately, the lack of a strict definition highlights the subjective nature of these terms in the context of space exploration.
waterwalker10
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
OK, so I work for an organization that deals with "space" 24/7 and controls satellites. We had a discussion today on whether INNER/OUTER SPACE starts at 100Km above the Earth or where the atmosphere becomes a complete vacuum. NASA says 50 miles...ect...

My opinion is that Inner Space can be defined where the gravitational pull of the Earth reaches and Outer Space is where the gravitational pull diminishes. Some argued this point with "Our Solar System is acted upon gravitational pull by the Sun, the Milky way Galaxy and even the Universe."

So where does it begin/end? Can this even be defined? Again...this seems to be a "your opinion" answerable question so...what is it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I've never heard of "inner space" and I'm pretty sure NASA doesn't use a term like "outer space".

In any case, there is no strict boundary between the atmosphere and space and there is no distance at which the Earth's gravitational influence drops to zero. For the purpose of putting a criteria on who can be considered an astronaut, "space" is defined to be 100 km up.
 
Back in the day inner space referred to under the surface of the ocean.
 
I took a orbital dynamics class last year, and our definition was 130 km because that's apparently the lowest altitude at which an object can achieve temporary orbit.
 
Welcome to PF...

That's, imo, a better definition than 100km because getting up to 100km doesn't really do anything useful for you.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top