Electric Field of an Insulating Cylindrical Shell

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylindrical Shell
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field and potential of a long cylindrical insulating shell with specified inner and outer radii and a uniform charge density. For distances outside the shell, such as 1.87 m, the electric field can be determined using Gauss's law, which involves integrating the charge density over the volume. The participants emphasize the importance of correctly identifying the Gaussian surface and the charge enclosed when applying Gauss's law. Additionally, they discuss the integration needed to find the electric potential at the outer radius, clarifying that the potential should be calculated from the electric field between the inner and outer radii. The conversation highlights the need for careful application of formulas and integration techniques in electrostatics.
Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

A long cylindrical insulating shell has an inner radius of a = 1.38 m and an outer radius of b = 1.61 m. The shell has a constant charge density of 4.80 C/m3.
1. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 1.87 m from the axis?
2. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 1.51 m from the axis?
3. If we take the potential at the axis to be zero, what is the electric potential at the outer radius of the shell?

Homework Equations


E=\frac{kq}{r^2}
\oint \vec{E}\vec{dr}= \frac{Q_{Enclosed}}{\epsilon_{o}}

The Attempt at a Solution


For 1 i use E=\frac{kq}{r^2} but i am confused on finding q because i am given density of c/m^3. I am assuming an infinity long cyclinder?\vec{}
 

Attachments

  • InsulatingCylindricalShell.gif
    InsulatingCylindricalShell.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,119
Physics news on Phys.org
Winzer said:

Homework Statement

A long cylindrical insulating shell has an inner radius of a = 1.38 m and an outer radius of b = 1.61 m. The shell has a constant charge density of 4.80 C/m3.
1. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 1.87 m from the axis?
2. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 1.51 m from the axis?
3. If we take the potential at the axis to be zero, what is the electric potential at the outer radius of the shell?

Homework Equations


E=\frac{kq}{r^2}
\oint \vec{E}\vec{dr}= \frac{Q_{Enclosed}}{\epsilon_{o}}
careful.. the integral should be E.da, not E.dr

The Attempt at a Solution


For 1 i use E=\frac{kq}{r^2} but i am confused on finding q because i am given density of c/m^3. I am assuming an infinity long cyclinder?\vec{}

Take a cylindrical section of arbitrary length L...
 
learningphysics said:
careful.. the integral should be E.da, not E.dr

Take a cylindrical section of arbitrary length L...

You are correct dA.
So:
dE= \frac{kdQ}{r^2}, dQ=pdV \longrightarrow dQ= 4.80 C/m^3 * 2\pi r l dr
 
Then:
E= \int \frac{k 4.80* 2 \pi r l}{r^2}dr
With he boundries a=a b=b
 
Winzer said:
Then:
E= \int \frac{k 4.80* 2 \pi r l}{r^2}dr
With he boundries a=a b=b

No... use gauss' law... what is your gaussian shell... what is the charge enclosed...
 
Oh of course..I would pick a cyclinder as my G surface.
 
Winzer said:
Oh of course..I would pick a cyclinder as my G surface.

exactly. can you write out the integral using gauss law for the first part? we need the field 1.87 m away.
 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks. i got 1 & 2.
 
how about 3?
I know V=\frac{kq}{r}
 
  • #10
Winzer said:
how about 3?
I know V=\frac{kq}{r}

Nah... I don't think that'll work...

The voltage at r minus the voltage at 0 is:

-\int_0^r{\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}

You need to integrate this from 0 to b=1.61...
 
  • #11
But then i get a ln(r/0), with other stuff infront. ln is -inf?
 
  • #12
Winzer said:
But then i get a ln(r/0), with other stuff infront. ln is -inf?

That doesn't look right... the integral from 0 to 1.38m is 0... because the field is 0 for this part... so you just need the integral from 1.38 to 1.61.
 
  • #13
so does:
V=\frac{-p (b^2-a^2)}{2 \epsilon_{o}}ln(\frac{b}{a})
sound on the right track?
 
  • #14
Winzer said:
so does:
V=\frac{-p (b^2-a^2)}{2 \epsilon_{o}}ln(\frac{b}{a})
sound on the right track?

Hmm... I'm getting something different. Can you show how you got that integral?
 
  • #15
Well how should I do it?
 
  • #16
Winzer said:
Well how should I do it?

Get the field inside the insulator. Then do -\int_{1.38}^{1.61}\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}

What do you get for the field in terms of r?

Use gauss' law. 4.80*{\pi}r^2h = 2{\pi}rh*E
 
Last edited:
  • #17
learningphysics said:
Get the field inside the insulator. Then do -\int_{1.38}^{1.61}\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}

What do you get for the field in terms of r?

Use gauss' law. 4.80*{\pi}r^2h = 2{\pi}rh*E

mmm.. i Think it should be E= \frac{-p(b^2-a^2)}{2r \epsilon_{o}}
I choose -p(b^2-a^2)=Q_{enclosed} because i had to integrate to find the charge enclosed.
 
  • #18
Winzer said:
mmm.. i Think it should be E= \frac{-p(b^2-a^2)}{2r \epsilon_{o}}
I choose -p(b^2-a^2)=Q_{enclosed} because i had to integrate to find the charge enclosed.

But the charge enclosed changes with r. You're integrating from r = 1.38 to 1.61... as you increase r, the charge enclosed becomes bigger.
 
  • #19
so b is replaced with r
 
  • #20
Winzer said:
so b is replaced with r

Ah... yes, you're right... I made a mistake in my post. I should have written:

4.80*{\pi}(r^2 - a^2)h = 2{\pi}rh*E

So that gives what you have by replacing b with r.
 
  • #21
ok, cool I got it. I just made the mistake of not letting charge vary with r.
 
Back
Top