Integral in Physics - Learn How to Solve Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackcode
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of integrals in physics, particularly in calculating work done by forces. It explains that integrals are used to sum infinitesimally small components, such as breaking down the distance in the work formula into differential elements. An example is provided using the spring force, illustrating how the integral leads to the formula W = 0.5*ks^2. Additionally, a participant seeks clarification on how to express changes in the magnetic field (dB) when the radius (R) in the equation B = (μ₀*i)/(2π*R) varies, highlighting the relationship between R and its differential dR. The conversation emphasizes the importance of integrals in solving complex physics problems.
blackcode
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can you help me know more about the integral in physics? Sometimes, I see some problems use this to solve. How can I figure out? thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You usually use the integral when you want to do a sum of infinitisemally (Blah, my spelling sucks.. :P) small parts of something... or a sum of infinitesmally small parts of something multiplied by something else...
For example... work..
W = Fs (Where s is the distance in the direction of the force... leaving out the vector dot product)
If you were to, instead of take s as a whole distance, break s up into differential elements of infinitesmally small value ds, the work done over this infinitesmally small distance would be:
dW = F ds
And that uses the concept of integrals in the sense that you want the TOTAL work done... i.e. the sum of all those differential elements:
W = dW1 + dW2 + dW3... + dWn
Where n is where the segments finally end at the final distance.
And since the integral is essentially an infinite amount of sums of small bits of... stuff... you can use its concept to find the total sum.
It's especially useful for the work done by a spring; since the force is non-constant overall, which would mean ks^2 wouldn't work as a formula...
So, you use the concept of the integral...
At anyone point, the difference in work from the point just before it would be:
dW = F ds
You know that the spring force is F = ks... so: (where k is a constant)
dW = ks ds (Where ds is an infinitesmally small difference in distance)
Since it would be long and boring to do this by hand, we use integration:
W = integral (ks)ds = 0.5*ks^2
And that's where that formula comes from...

I probably made a mistake somewhere in my vague, useless, inaccurate attempt at helping you out, so I don't mind if someone corrects me...

By the way, I think this should be in another forum. :P
 
I'm working with the equation B=((mu sub naught)*i)/(2*pi*R). I know that R is changing, but I don't know what dB would look like. I thought that R in the original equation would be dR in the new one, but it doesn't make sense to me that dR would be to the negative one power. Do you have any ideas?
 
WhoWeAre said:
I'm working with the equation B=((mu sub naught)*i)/(2*pi*R). I know that R is changing, but I don't know what dB would look like. I thought that R in the original equation would be dR in the new one, but it doesn't make sense to me that dR would be to the negative one power. Do you have any ideas?

well as in equation
dB=((mu sub naught)*i)/(2*pi*dR) u can c dRis one of the denominator, to make it a neumerator, multiply and divide the equation with R^-1, there u have your dR with negative one in power. this is just done for the sake of simplicity coz it is sometimes easier to solve an intergral with variable in neumerator rather that otherwise.
 
I assume you're working with the equation for an infinitely long wire. The equation you have there was derived from a more general equation so if r varies you will not have to do any sort of integral. That equation is the complete picture in the limit that the wire is infinitely long. So in this case B varies as 1/r with a bunch of constants in front of it.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top