Integrating, probably by parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbrmbrg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating parts
mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2
I have the expression \int{x(\ln{x})^3dx}
I thought I had a quick way to integrate by parts but it turned out that I had accidentally evaluated \int{x\ln{x}dx} instead.
Revisiting \int{x(\ln{x})^3dx}, I wanted to start by making a strange substitution, wherein u=ln(x), du=1/x dx, and x=e^u. This meant that when I rewrote the integral, instead of multiplying dx by a constant to get it to be du, I multiplied it by x (which in this case was e^u). Is that allowed? Because I got a very different, much uglier answer than the book's.

I'd appreciate any comments, whether on my weird "method" or on a more standard approach to evaluating \int{x(\ln{x})^3dx}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try integration by parts with u = (ln(x))^3 and dv = x dx
 
Last edited:
Your substitution method should work fine. Your should be integrating \int{Exp[2u] u^3du}. If you do it by integration by parts, you will need to do it 3 times.
 
wurth_skidder_23 said:
Try integration by parts with u = (ln(x))^3 and dv = x dx
thanks, that got me the book's answer!
 
And yes, the other way does work also. Nifty!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top