Integrating the product of an exponential and a first derivative

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a simpler method to integrate the expression exp(x)*f'(x) beyond integration by parts, which leads to a complex integral involving f(x). Participants suggest that the complexity of f(x) limits the effectiveness of integration by parts and express doubt about the existence of a simpler technique. One contributor emphasizes the importance of knowing the specific form of f'(x) to explore potential solutions. Numerical methods or approximations are recommended as alternatives due to the complicated nature of the function. The consensus is that without additional information about f(x), a straightforward integration trick may not be available.
bventer
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, besides integration by parts, does anyone know of a simple integration trick to solve the integral (wrt x) of exp(x)*f'(x)?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Could you show me how it's done by integration by parts?
 
Using integration by parts I get: exp(x)*f(x) - Int[exp(x)*f(x), dx]. But that doesn't really help me due to the complexity of the function f(x). I was hoping there might be a clever trick to exploit the fact that part of my integrand is a first derivative?
 
that doesn't really help me due to the complexity of the function f(x).
Why not showing us what is f '(x) ?
 
bventer said:
Using integration by parts I get: exp(x)*f(x) - Int[exp(x)*f(x), dx]. But that doesn't really help me due to the complexity of the function f(x). I was hoping there might be a clever trick to exploit the fact that part of my integrand is a first derivative?

Oh sorry, I missed the ' in f'(x) and thought you tried to find a solution to the integral of exf(x).

I can't think of another way to show it besides that technique, maybe someone else can.
 
To JJacquelin: I you wish, see attached jpg (apologies, but I am not well versed in Latex)
 

Attachments

  • f(x).JPG
    f(x).JPG
    15.7 KB · Views: 486
Mentallic said:
Oh sorry, I missed the ' in f'(x) and thought you tried to find a solution to the integral of exf(x).

I can't think of another way to show it besides that technique, maybe someone else can.
Ok, thanks for having a look Mentallic
 
bventer said:
To JJacquelin: I you wish, see attached jpg (apologies, but I am not well versed in Latex)

How is the y(H) function defined?
 
Mentallic said:
How is the y(H) function defined?
y(H) is a quadratic: a0 + a1*H + a2*H^2
 
  • #10
Probably, there is no analytic way to integrate a so complicated function.
Better think to use numerical calculus, or approximations if it is a problem of physics.
 
  • #11
Thanks JJacquelin, but I did say that I was hoping there might be a clever trick to exploit the fact that part of my integrand is a first derivative...
 
  • #12
I was hoping there might be a clever trick to exploit the fact that part of my integrand is a first derivative...
I doubt that a "clever trick" exists. By the way, the first derivative of what function ?
If the function is as complicated as its derivative,then there is few hope.
 
  • #13
bventer said:
Thanks JJacquelin, but I did say that I was hoping there might be a clever trick to exploit the fact that part of my integrand is a first derivative...
Yes, there is! It is precisely the "integration by parts", letting dv= f'(x)dx that you initially did.
 
  • #14
Thanks, but unless I'm missing something this takes me back to the point I mentioned earlier in the thread: exp(x)*f(x) - Int[exp(x)*f(x), dx], which doesn't really help me due to the complexity of the function f(x).
 

Similar threads

Back
Top