Integrating with indented contour

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmycricket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
jimmycricket
Messages
115
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Evaluate the following integral by integrating the corresponding complex function.

\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{dx}{x(x^2+x+1)}

Homework Equations



Cauchy's Residue Theorem for simple pole at a:Res(f;a)=\displaystyle\lim_{z\rightarrow a} (z-a)f(z)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used the definite real integral widget on wolfram which states that the integral does not converge. Will I be able to show this is the case by integrating around the semi circular contour indented at 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmycricket said:

Homework Statement


Evaluate the following integral by integrating the corresponding complex function.

\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{dx}{x(x^2+x+1)}

Homework Equations



Cauchy's Residue Theorem for simple pole at a:Res(f;a)=\displaystyle\lim_{z\rightarrow a} (z-a)f(z)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used the definite real integral widget on wolfram which states that the integral does not converge. Will I be able to show this is the case by integrating around the semi circular contour indented at 0?

Did you look at it first? I mean plot it say from -10 to 10? Looks to me it has the right shape to converge in the Cauchy Principal Value sense. That is the only way it can converge since it has a pole on the path of integration. Alpha is telling you it diverges in the Riemann sense. Did you try:

Code:
Integrate[1/(x*(x^2 + x + 1)), 
  {x, -Infinity, Infinity}, PrincipalValue -> True]

However, if you're not familiar with Principal-valued integrals, you may want to look that up.

Edit: made a mistake with the function. It's +1 and I corrected it above but still everything I said in regards to the function with -1 applies to this function as well.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top