Integration by parts/substitution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick Jarvis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Nick Jarvis
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
Hi. I think I jumped too eagerly into my latest module, as I am positive it makes many assumptions on previous experience. I am obviously lacking.

I have created a question in Word, but the equations don;t appear to be copying into this thread. So I have uploaded question instead. If this is against the rules please let me know, and I will attempt to re-create the equations here instead.

The question involves integration of ∫x(^(a-1)) e(^(-bx)) dx - and I have shown in the word doc what I think I need to do. However, the final answer is:

Γ(a)/ba

Which I know I won;t get from integration, but my answer should relate to this answer, using one of the distribution methods.

Many thanks
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Make life easy for yourself and study how to apply partial integration on ##\displaystyle \int_0^\infty x^n e^{-x} dx##

(and yes, the Gamma function is involved)
 
  • Like
Likes Nick Jarvis
Thanks BvU, will take a look this evening.
 
ok. I have integrated ∫xn ex using parts and I get:

xn ex - ∫exnxn-1 this equates (I hope) to:

ex(xn - nxn-1) this can be simplified obvs. Is this correct?

Thanks
 
However, if I have ∫BxB-1 e-xB dx, can I not integrate by substitution?

Let u = xB so du = BxB-1dx which gives:

∫e-udu and therefore the answer is -e-xB + c

I know that is not correct, but I thought I could integrate by either substitution OR parts? This integration is key to me understanding stats/probability, but it has been many years since I have integrated.

Just looked again, and I know that ∫BxB-1 = xB, but how do I incorporate that into it when I also have exB

Many thanks
 
Nick Jarvis said:
and I get: xn ex - ∫exnxn-1 dx
correct so far.
this equates (I hope) to: ex(xn - nxn-1)
Your hope is in vain. You can not just make an ##\displaystyle\int## sign disappear !

Do not confuse yourself by omitting the ##dx##.

What are the bounds of the integral ? What did you do with them ? What is the meaning of the (correct) expression you got from integration by parts ? ##\quad## [edit] of the wrong expression ##xe^x## instead of ##xe^{-x}## :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Nick Jarvis
Oops, I overlooked that you overlooked the minus sign in ##e^{-x}##. Try again !
 
  • Like
Likes Nick Jarvis
Apologies. Have spoken also to my tutor and I have now worked it out. Thanks for your input. Much appreciated :)
 
  • Like
Likes BvU

Similar threads

Back
Top