Integration by parts VS. Formula in text

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
16 replies · 4K views
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
I am either making the same mistake repeatedly, or I can't factor!

I did this [tex]\int\ln(2x-3)dx[/tex] first by parts and then using the formula [tex]\int\ln u du=u\ln u-u+C[/tex]

By parts I got:
[tex]u=\ln(2x-3)[/tex] dv=dx

so [tex]=x\ln(2x-3)-\int\frac{2x}{2x-3}dx[/tex] and by long division:

[tex]=x\ln(2x-3)\int [1+\frac{3}{2x+3}]dx[/tex]

[tex]=x\ln(2x-3)-x-\frac{3}{2}\ln(2x+3)+C[/tex]



but I can't get that to match the formula result of

[tex](2x-3)\ln(2x-3)-(2x+3)+C[/tex]

Is the by parts correct?

Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am getting closer, but I must have screwed up a sign or something in the Int by parts...but I can't see where ...
 
that's what i got, let me take the derivative and to check.
 
Last edited:
Okay, so I have fixed a sign error and I get from parts:

[tex]x\ln(2x-3)-x-\frac{3}{2}\ln(2x-3)[/tex] and then multiplying thru

by 2 I get [tex]2x\ln(2x-3)-2x-3\ln(2x-3)[/tex] which is extremely close...but I can't figure out how to factor it properly...

Almost there :)

I just can't figure out to do with that -2x in the "middle" its a term not a factor...
 
For one,

[tex]x\ln(2x-3)\int [1+\frac{3}{2x+3}]dx[/tex]

should have a minus sign within the integral.

In the following step, you've multiplied the - outside the integral(that's supposed to be there :wink:) with that +.
 
it checks out after taking the derivative.
 
neutrino said:
For one,

[tex]x\ln(2x-3)\int [1+\frac{3}{2x+3}]dx[/tex]

should have a minus sign within the integral.

In the following step, you've multiplied the - outside the integral(that's supposed to be there :wink:) with that +.

I don't follow. If I do that integral off to the side I get x+(3/2)ln(2x-3)

and then i distibuted the - sign...

EDIT: I see, I just forgot to put it in the 1st post...scroll down to post#4
 
Last edited:
rocophysics said:
it checks out after taking the derivative.

What does? from which post#. I can't get it to match the formula.

Casey
 
first post, except that the last ln should be ln(2x-3)

i hate the tables, i prefer hand-method :p takes too long and comes with errors because i suck, but is all good.
 
My goal though is to get what I got in post #4 to look like the formula from the textbook which looks like this [tex](2x-3)\ln(2x-3)-(2x+3)+C[/tex]

but I have [tex]2x\ln(2x-3)-2x-3\ln(2x-3)+C[/tex]

which is close...how does that factor?

If I factor that don't I just get [tex](2x-3)\ln(2x-3)-2x+C[/tex] ?
 
Last edited:
why can't I factor this:smile:??!
 
lol that's really hard ... quit obsessing!
 
Last edited:
rocophysics said:
lol that's really hard ... quit obsessing!

But it is part of the assignment!
 
Saladsamurai said:
But it is part of the assignment!
to put it in table form? eek!

i got:

[tex]\ln{(2x-3)}[2x-3]-x[/tex] ...

but idk what to do after that. and how did you get -2x?
 
Maybe it's because what you're trying to find is an indefinite integral, and the answers to different methods employed usually differ by a constant.
 
This might help:

[tex]-x+C=-\frac{1}{2}(2x)+C=-\frac{1}{2}(2x-3)+C-\frac{3}{2}=-\frac{1}{2}(2x-3)+C_1[/tex]

In which [tex]C_1=C-\frac{3}{2}[/tex] another constant is.
 
salad, I can't quote your post, browser issues. But your "book formula" integral is in error.

[tex](2x-3)\ln(2x-3)-(2x-3)+C[/tex]

should read

[tex]\frac{1}{2}[(2x-3)\ln(2x-3)-(2x-3)]+C[/tex]

(I corrected your sign error)

You cannot in general just use a formula for an integral of f(u) with a direct substitution of u=g(x) into the result. This is because what you are actually doing with a proper substitution is

[tex]\int{f(g(x))}dx = \int{\frac{dx}{du}[f(u)]}du = \int{\frac{f(u)}{u'}}du[/tex]

In this case, u'(x) = 2, so you should divide the final expression by two.

I did not check your integration by parts, but the above correct answer for the formula method tallies with it, except for a constant term :

[tex]x\ln{(2x-3)} - x - \frac{3}{2}\ln{(2x-3)} = \frac{1}{2}(2x)\ln{(2x-3)} - \frac{1}{2}(2x) - \frac{1}{2}(3\ln{(2x-3)}) = \frac{1}{2}[(2x-3)\ln{(2x-3) - 2x}] = \frac{1}{2}[(2x-3)\ln{(2x-3) - (2x - 3)}] + C[/tex]

which all works out.
 
Last edited: