Integration limits for Gaussian surface

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric flux through a nonconducting spherical shell, the Gaussian surface should be defined just inside the outer radius B, meaning the limits of integration would be from A to a variable r_g, where A < r_g < B. The flux calculation focuses on the surface area of the Gaussian surface rather than including the actual surface at radius B. It's important to differentiate between calculating flux through a surface and determining the potential difference between the inner and outer surfaces. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in understanding these concepts in electrostatics. Properly setting the limits of integration is crucial for accurate calculations.
auk411
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Say you have a nonconducting spherical shell. A is the inner radius and B is the outer radius. If you wanted to set up an integral to find the flux, would the gaussian surface include B, or be just inside it? That is, would the limits of integration go from A to B?

If the limits did not include the actual surface with the radius B, would you just do something like this: come up with some other variable r_g, where A < r_g < B for the upper limit of integration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
auk411 said:
Say you have a nonconducting spherical shell. A is the inner radius and B is the outer radius. If you wanted to set up an integral to find the flux, ...
To find the flux through which surface, A or B? I suspect that you are confusing finding the flux through either A or B with finding the potential difference between A and B.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top