Intensity & Amplitude of Gaussian Beam

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between intensity and amplitude for a Gaussian beam is defined by the equation I = ½ c εo Eo², where Eo is the amplitude of the electric field. Intensity, or irradiance, can also be expressed in two dimensions as I(x,y) = [I0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x²/(2σx²) - y²/(2σy²)], with I0 representing total power. The discussion highlights that intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude, but the exact proportionality constant varies based on units and assumptions about beam symmetry. Additionally, the Poynting vector and power density equations further illustrate the relationship in terms of electric and magnetic fields. Overall, the intensity of a Gaussian beam is intricately linked to its amplitude and distribution characteristics.
russel.arnold
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Can tell me the exact relationship between the intensity and the amplitude for a gaussian beam
?
I know that I is proportional to |A|2 .. but i want the value of this proportianality constant
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's more properly called the irradiance (assuming you want the power per unit area), and for any electromagnetic wave (not just Gaussian beams) the relation is
I = ½ c εo Eo2
where Eo is the amplitude of the electric field.
 
I(x) = [I0/σ(2π)0.5] exp[-x2/(2σ2)]

where ∫I(x) dx = I0 and σ is the rms width.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
In engineering units you drop the "c" In the above intensity equation and you'll have Watts.
 
Bob S said:
I(x) = [I0/σ(2π)0.5] exp[-x2/(2σ2)]

where ∫I(x) dx = I0 and σ is the rms width.

Bob S
But that isn't in terms of the amplitude, as requested by the OP. You're also assuming the beam is Gaussian in just 1 transverse dimension. If the beam has a circularly symmetric intensity profile, things are different.

Antiphon said:
In engineering units you drop the "c" In the above intensity equation and you'll have Watts.
Actually, dropping the c gives the energy density in J/m3.
I'm using SI units. I'm not aware of any official "engineering units", unless you also mean the SI system?
 
Redbelly98 said:
But that isn't in terms of the amplitude, as requested by the OP. You're also assuming the beam is Gaussian in just 1 transverse dimension. If the beam has a circularly symmetric intensity profile, things are different.
I believe this is the correct normalized Gaussian beam distribution in two dimensions:

I(x,y) = [I0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)]

where ∫I(x,y) dx dy = I0, and σx and σy are the rms widths in the x and y dimensions.

At any point x and y, the intensity is equal to the square of the amplitude.

Bob S
 
Bob S said:
I believe this is the correct normalized Gaussian beam distribution in two dimensions:

I(x,y) = [I0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)]

where ∫I(x,y) dx dy = I0, and σx and σy are the rms widths in the x and y dimensions.
I0 is perhaps a poor choice of variable name, in that it has different units than I(x,y). I.e., I0 is in Watts and I(x,y) is W/m2.

At any point x and y, the intensity is equal to the square of the amplitude.

Bob S
Not in SI units, or Gaussian-cgs units either. Assuming "the amplitude" refers to the electric field (And I can't imagine what else it would mean.)

(Electric field)2 has units of energy/m3 in Gaussian units, or [energy/(charge*distance)]2 in SI units. Neither is consistent with intensity = energy/(time*distance2), so I maintain that the relationship is proportional, but not equal.
 
I had this image on hand, thought I would share it. This is a power cross section of a gaussian laser beam. Each color represents a power level. Other beam parameters are given to the left.

4941far.jpg
 
Redbelly98 said:
I0 is perhaps a poor choice of variable name, in that it has different units than I(x,y). I.e., I0 is in Watts and I(x,y) is W/m2.Not in SI units, or Gaussian-cgs units either. Assuming "the amplitude" refers to the electric field (And I can't imagine what else it would mean.)

(Electric field)2 has units of energy/m3 in Gaussian units, or [energy/(charge*distance)]2 in SI units. Neither is consistent with intensity = energy/(time*distance2), so I maintain that the relationship is proportional, but not equal.
We consider a normalized bi-gaussian electromagnetic radiation beam traveling in the z direction.

The Poynting vector is P(x,y) = E(x,y) x H(x,y) watts/m2 at every point in space, where E(x,y) is in volts per meter, and H(x,y) is in amps per meter.

E(x,y)/H(x,y) = Z0 = 377 ohms in free space

So the power density is w(x,y) = E2(x,y)/(2·Z0) watts/m2

or E(x,y) = sqrt[2·Z0·w(x,y)] volts/m

where the bi-gaussian distribution is w(x,y) = [W0/(σxσy2π)] exp[-x2/(2σx2) - y2/(2σy2)] watts/m2

where the total beam power is W0 = ∫w(x,y) dx dy watts

Bob S
 
Last edited:
Back
Top