Intensity and the Double Slit Experiment.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the intensity formula for interfering waves, highlighting the combination of electric field components from two slits. It points out that if two in-phase waves of equal magnitude combine, the resulting intensity would be four times that of a single wave, raising concerns about energy conservation. The argument emphasizes that measuring energy flow from two separate light sources should yield only double the energy, not quadruple. There is confusion regarding the "union" of fields and its applicability in different scenarios, particularly when all waves are in phase, leading to constructive interference. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of wave interference and energy conservation principles.
Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
In viewing a derivation of the formula describing the intensity of the interfering waves, I noticed how the electric field components were combined - one from slit a, the other from slit b. The intensity is then proportional to the square of this value. But this would mean that two in phase waves of equal magnitude would result in 4 times the intensity of one alone. However, if you had two light sources of intensity I separate from one another and measured the energy per unit of time transferred to A area, shouldn't you only get twice the energy flow when then combining the two sources? Otherwise it seems energy is not conserved. In another way put: E^2 + E^2 ≠(E + E)^2 at which the first case in the derivation uses the latter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're overlooking that elsewhere the waves are canceling. When you calculate the total energy it comes out right.
 
Yes, I believe I understand this. I guess what confuses me is the "union" of fields. It does't seem as if this thinking could be used under any situation. For example when all waves from two sources are in phase (not speaking as in a double split experiment.) Then all waves would be constructive.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top