Intensity of different color light & its relation to energy AND Amplitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between light intensity, amplitude, and photon energy in monochromatic light waves of different colors. It is established that blue light photons have higher energy due to their higher frequency, while red light photons have lower energy, yet both can have the same intensity. This leads to the conclusion that red light, having more photons, must have a different amplitude compared to blue light, which has fewer photons. The confusion arises from the interpretation of amplitude in relation to intensity and photon count, as amplitude is linked to energy flux. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding how amplitude and intensity relate to the number of photons in light waves of differing frequencies.
mlgpawnstar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi Let's stick to the classical limit.

We have 2 monochromatic light waves of same intensity. Let's say one is blue and one is red.

Now this means the individual photons of the blue light have more energy(obviously, higher frequency) and the red light photons have lower energy. But since the two light waves have equal intensity, they have the same energy arriving/second.. Right? I think this part is obvious. This then means that the red light wave has more photons and the blue light wave has fewer photons.

Well let's move on to amplitude of the light wave, now this sort of scales with the intensity squared so these two light beams should have the same Amplitude? But Amplitude can also be seen as a function of the number of photons..

Here in lies my current confusion. Sorry if this is so simple. Anyone know of a basic way to get around this and stay consistent?

Either the two light is going to have different amplitude or the same amplitude while the have the same intensity but different frequencies.
 
Science news on Phys.org
There is no contradiction. The number of photons in a light wave is dependent on the amplitude. You can calculate the number per second exactly as you described, by looking at the power of the light, and using E_{photon}=\hbar \nu so red light of the same intensity has more photons.
 
Hi, light intensity or energy flux is proportional to photon flux, i.e number of photons per unit time per unit surface and to individual photon energy. Does that answer your question?
 
Hi 0xDEADBEEF if # of photons depends on Amplitude, and if Amplitude comes from Intensity, since these two beams have the same intensity, they will have the same Amplitude, and thus the same # of photons?? (Obviously this isn't the case.)

"amplitude" is what is throwing me off here.


Alkim: I understand this but how does this relate with Amplitude?
 
mlgpawnstar said:
Hi 0xDEADBEEF if # of photons depends on Amplitude, and if Amplitude comes from Intensity, since these two beams have the same intensity, they will have the same Amplitude, and thus the same # of photons?? (Obviously this isn't the case.)
How do you make that conclusion? If 'amplitude' relates to the amount of energy flux and short wavelength photons have more individual energy then either the same amplitude would imply more red photons or the same number of red photons would imply lower amplitude. (Two ways of looking at the same thing.)
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top