Intensity of solar radiation at earth orbit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the derivation of the solar constant, which is the intensity of sunlight hitting the Earth, measured at approximately 1370 watts per meter squared. The participant seeks a mathematical explanation for this value, particularly how it relates to the radius of Earth's orbit and the amplitude of the electric field in electromagnetic waves. They clarify that the solar constant is an observed quantity rather than a derived one, and they have found that it can be related to the sun's power divided by the surface area of a sphere at radius r. Additionally, the conversation touches on the forces acting on a solar sail and the equations of motion involved, raising questions about the resolution of these forces in different directions. Overall, the participant is looking for further insights and resources to deepen their understanding of these concepts.
tomelwood
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am try to understand how the value of 1370 watts per metre squared for the intensity of sunlight hitting the Earth has been derived. Is there a way to see this mathematically?


Homework Equations


I understand about how the intensity is related to Poyntings vector, by taking it's average over the wavelength (ie multiplying it by 0.5) but I don't see how this has anything to do with the radius of the orbit.


The Attempt at a Solution


The equation for I is 0.5*c*ε_0 * E^2_0 where E_0 is the amplitude of the Electric part of the EM wave, and ε_0 is the permitivity of free space 8.85*10^-12.
How do I calculate the E_0 value? And does that vary with radius? I can't imagine that it does, so I'm back to square 1! I'm trying to calculate the radiation pressure on a surface at differing distances from the sun, so knowing how and why the intensity changes would be greatly helpful
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomelwood said:
I am try to understand how the value of 1370 watts per metre squared for the intensity of sunlight hitting the Earth has been derived. Is there a way to see this mathematically?
The solar constant is not derived. It is an observed quantity.
 
So rather than calculating the solar constant from the sun's power, rather the power of the sun is calculated from the observed solar constant. OK. I have since discovered that I can relate the power of the sun to the intensity of the sunlight passing through a sphere of radius r, simply by dividing it by the area of said sphere. I presume this is how the sun's power was calculated in the first place. If this is correct, then it should serve the purpose that I require. Hopefully!

In addition to this, I have read in a journal that the forces acting on a solar sail inclined at an angle θ to the normal are the force of gravity from the sun (Fq) (we're in free space, away from planets etc) and the force exerted by the sail perpendicular to it's surface (Fs)
This journal then constructs the equations f motion thus:
(-Fg + Fs cos θ)/m = du/dt - v^2/r ; where u is radial velocity and v is tangential velocity (making v^2/r angular velocity?) and r is distance from Sun, and m is total mass of spacecraft
and
(-Fs sin θ)/m = dv/dt + uv/r

I can't fathom how these have been arrived at. They appear to be resolving horizontally and vertically, but why is the radial component involved in the vertical resolution and vice versa?

Any hints/tips would be great, or links to other resources that explain the same thing.

Many thanks.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top