Interaction in QED: Electron/Proton Attraction & Repulsion

  • Thread starter Thread starter paweld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction Qed
paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
Why according to QED two electrons repel each oteher while
electron and proton attract. What are Feynman diagrams for
these proceses. Thanks for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paweld said:
Why according to QED two electrons repel each oteher while
electron and proton attract. What are Feynman diagrams for
these proceses. Thanks for help.

QED is capable of calculating only the S-matrix for the electron-electron or electron-proton scattering. So, from QED you can know amplitudes that connect asymptotic states (long before and long after the collision). Form these data you can indirectly figure out the type of interaction between colliding particles (i.e., attraction vs. repulsion). However, QED cannot tell you how exactly the particles move when they are in close proximity.

Eugene.
 
Thanks for your answer. I wonder if calculating S-matrix for electron-proton or
electron-electron scatering involves considering quantum nature of electromagnetic
field or we only assume that there is hamiltonian of interaction between these
particles (no exchange of photon is considered).
 
paweld said:
Thanks for your answer. I wonder if calculating S-matrix for electron-proton or
electron-electron scatering involves considering quantum nature of electromagnetic
field or we only assume that there is hamiltonian of interaction between these
particles (no exchange of photon is considered).

In traditional textbook QED the interaction Hamiltonian is a product of charged fields and the photon field. So, integrals for scattering amplitudes contain factors (photon propagators) that are obtained as certain matrix element of products of photon fields. In Feynman diagrams these propagators show up as wavy "photon lines". From this some people conclude that charges interact via "exchanges of virtual photons". But in my opinion this conclusion is completely arbitrary.

There is also a "dressed particle" formulation of QED in which the Hamiltonian of the electron+electron system does not contain photon contributions. In this approach, the electron-electron interaction can be interpreted as a direct instantaneous potential (Coulomb + corrections). The S-matrix computed in this approach is exactly the same as in the traditional renormalized QED.

Eugene.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top