Interchanging Limits: When Does Equality Hold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EV33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was trying to prove something and I ended up in a situation similar to,

(limit t\rightarrow0)(limit s\rightarrow0) f(x+s,y+t)

=(limit s\rightarrow0)(limit t\rightarrow0)f(x+s,y+t)

My question is when does this equality hold. I can't find it anywhere?



Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you so much. My function is continuous.
 
EV33 said:
Thank you so much. My function is continuous.

Sorry, deleted my answer because I was looking at something else and wanted to concentrate on that for a bit. But sure, if f is continuous at (x,y) you can interchange the limits. I was trying to think of a case where it's not true.
 
There exist examples, in most Calculus texts, which I don't have available now, of functions f(x, y) in which approaching (0, 0) along any straight line (such as going from (x, y) to (x, 0) then from (x, 0) to (0, 0), which is the same as "lim_(x->0)lim_(y->0) f(x, y)" or going from (x, y) to (0, y) then from (0, y) to (0, 0), which is the same as "lim_(y->0)lim_(x->0) f(x,y)) gives the same answer, the value of the function, so that "situation holds" but taking the limit along a quadratic curve gives a different answer so the function is NOT continuous.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top