Interest Formula for Varying Time Units and Compoundings?

AI Thread Summary
The formula A=A0(1+r/k)^(kt) is not restricted to using years for t and annual compounding for k; it can be adapted to different time intervals. While r is typically expressed as an annual interest rate, both k and t can be defined in alternative time units, provided they are consistent. Adjusting the time unit requires recalibrating the interest rate accordingly to maintain accuracy. An example illustrates this by converting a scenario of multiple deposits over 12 years into a 9-month time unit with three compoundings per unit. This flexibility allows for diverse applications in financial calculations.
member 508213
For the formula A=A0(1+r/k)^(kt) does it only work if t is in years and k is how many times per year it is compounded?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Austin said:
For the formula A=A0(1+r/k)^(kt) does it only work if t is in years and k is how many times per year it is compounded?
No, I believe that r and k and t could be defined in terms of some different time interval, but I have only ever seen this formula used when the basic time interval is the year. The units of r are typically in terms of the interest in a year, k is usually the number of interest computing periods per year, and t is the number of years.
 
Austin said:
For the formula A=A0(1+r/k)^(kt) does it only work if t is in years and k is how many times per year it is compounded?

No, t is the time in time units (whatever that is) and k is the number of compoundings per time unit. Changing time units is common in applications, but you also need to change the interest rate to match the time unit.

Example: consider the problem of depositing $25 in Jan, Apr and Jul. Then $50 in Oct, Jan and Apr. Then $75 in Jul, Oct, Jan, and so on. Keep this pattern for 12 years. Suppose compounding is quarterly. The best way to tackle the problem is to change the time unit into 9 months and three compoundings per time unit.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top