Interference of Light: Explaining Transparency & Opacity

AI Thread Summary
A super thin film can appear transparent in transmitted light due to constructive interference allowing most light to pass through, while it appears opaque in reflected light due to destructive interference that cancels out certain wavelengths. The interaction of light waves at the film's surface leads to varying visibility depending on the angle of observation. When light strikes the film, some is reflected and some transmitted; the balance between these depends on the film's thickness and the wavelength of light. This phenomenon illustrates how interference effects can alter the perception of transparency and opacity. Understanding these principles clarifies why thin films can exhibit such contrasting visual properties.
SwAnK
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
hey found this question in my textbook...
explain using interferance why a super thin film is transparent or invisible in transmitted light but seems to be opaque when viewed with reflected light. Draw a diagram for your solution. any ideas?? i really have no idea. thanks for your time though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT: How much reflected light would there be if all the light were transmitted? :)
 
if all the light went through wouldn't it be "invisible" but how could it be opaque?, like i guess some reflected rays and incident rays would create destructive interferance, but wouldn't you still be able to see through?
 
Think of what your looking for. (Light that's reflected back or light that goes through)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top