Interior angles of a regular polygon

johncena
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
The number of sides of two regular polygons are in the ratio 5:4 and the difference between their interior angles is 6 degrees.Find the number of sides of the two polygons.

I forgot the relation between interior angles and the number of sides of a regular polygon.Can anyone help me to figure out the relation ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Call alpha the interior angle, and draw a triangle having as vertex 2 consecutive vertex of the polygon and the center of the polygon. You know all the angles in this triangle, and they are related by the fact that those 3 angles add up to 180 degrees. Solve for the number of edges of the polygon.
 
Hint:
Draw a triangle with one vertex at the polygonal centre, the other two vertices being the end points of a polygonal edge.

a) What relation between the number of sides and the angle associated with the centre vertex must exist?
b) What relation must exist between the central angle and the interior angle of the polygon?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top