Internal Energy: 10 Moles Helium & Oxygen at 100K

AI Thread Summary
The internal energy of 10 moles of helium at 100 K can be calculated using the formula U = (f/2)nRT, where f represents the degrees of freedom. Helium, being a monoatomic gas, has 3 translational degrees of freedom, leading to an internal energy of approximately 12,473 J. For diatomic gases like oxygen, the degrees of freedom increase, affecting the internal energy calculation. The distinction between monoatomic and diatomic gases is crucial for accurate internal energy assessments. Understanding these principles is essential for solving related thermodynamic problems.
edanzig
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
"What is the internal energy of 10 moles of helium at 100 K?"
The same question is asked about 10 moles of oxygen. I'm going to guess PV=nRT which would give 8,314 J as the PV value. Because (at least in chemistry this is true) delta H = delat E +/- work and work = PV, so PV would somehow resemble "internal energy." The answer given is 12,473 J which is 3/2 of the calculation. I know I am on the right track but it would be helpful if someone could just throw it together for me. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This isn't my best area, but I'll try to get you started since nobody has responded yet.

edanzig said:
"What is the internal energy of 10 moles of helium at 100 K?"
The same question is asked about 10 moles of oxygen. I'm going to guess PV=nRT which would give 8,314 J as the PV value. Because (at least in chemistry this is true) delta H = delat E +/- work and work = PV, so PV would somehow resemble "internal energy." The answer given is 12,473 J which is 3/2 of the calculation. I know I am on the right track but it would be helpful if someone could just throw it together for me. Thanks

The first question to ask yourself is, "is helium a monoatomic or diatomic gas?" (That actually matters.)

Using that you can find CV , the heat capacity at constant volume. And from there, you can determine the internal energy.

This article can get you going, or I'm sure you can find the equivalent material in your textbook or coursework:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_capacity_ratio

The reason (or at least a reason) that the internal energy is not simply PV is that some additional energy is stored in the form of microscopic rotational energy of the atoms/molecules. The internal energy is PV for an ideal gas [Edit: here, by "ideal gas" I mean a gas that is neither monoatomic nor diatomic*], but that simple relationship doesn't hold when actual matter consisting of atoms and molecules are involved. :smile:

*[It is possible to model "ideal" monoatomic and "ideal" diatomic gases, however, as is done in the link I provided. That's probably the approach you should use for this problem.]
 
Last edited:
One can use the equipartition theorem to get that the internal energy of a perfect gas is equal to $$U=\frac{f}{2}Nk_B T$$

Where f is the number of degrees of freedom of the gas. It's 3 for a monoatomic molecule (3 translational degrees of freedom), and 4 (5? I can't remember) or higher for diatomic molecules as you start to get the vibration and rotational modes.

N in the above is the total number of molecules. Given the moles n, one has the equivalent formula:

$$U=\frac{f}{2}nRT$$
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top