Internal Energy of a Mole of Particles each with 3 Energy Levels

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the internal energy of a mole of particles, each having three energy levels, within the context of statistical mechanics. The original poster expresses uncertainty about extending the partition function from a single particle to a mole of particles, particularly regarding the implications of degeneracies and the correct formulation of the partition function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the single particle partition function and the partition function for a mole of particles, questioning how to properly account for distinguishability and degeneracies. Some participants suggest that the partition function can be expressed as a power of the single particle partition function, while others raise concerns about the implications of indistinguishability.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the formulation of the partition function for both distinguishable and indistinguishable particles. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the differences in treatment between these cases, and some participants have offered examples to illustrate their points. However, there is no explicit consensus reached on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of statistical mechanics, particularly in relation to the treatment of particle indistinguishability and the implications for the partition function. The original poster's concerns about overthinking the problem suggest a potential lack of confidence in their understanding of the material.

danyull
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A particle has three energy levels, ##E = 0##, ##\Delta##, and ##4\Delta##, where ##\Delta## is a positive constant. The lowest energy level is nondegenerate, whereas the other two are both doubly degenerate. Find the internal energy ##U## of a system of consisting of a mole of such particles.
Relevant Equations
The canonical partition function is ##Z=\sum\limits_i g(E_i) e^{-\beta E_i}##, and the internal energy is related by ##U=-\frac{\partial}{\partial\beta} \ln Z##.
Hello, I'm doing some refreshers before going back to school. Stat mech is my shakiest and I'd appreciate some help on this problem.

I know that for a single particle, the partition function will be $$Z = 1 + 2e^{-\beta\Delta} + 2e^{-4\beta\Delta}$$ and so its internal energy is $$\frac{1}{Z} \left( 2\Delta e^{-\beta\Delta} + 8\Delta e^{-4\beta\Delta} \right).$$ My only concern is how does this extend to a mole of particles? Since each particle can be in one of 5 energy states, this means that a mole of particles will have ##5^{N_A}## energy states, with many degeneracies. In this case, is there a more explicit way to express the partition function than the general expression above?

I feel like I'm overthinking things, and it just comes down to something like tacking on an ##N_A## somewhere. If so, I'd appreciate any rough explanation why. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, $$Z=z^N$$ is the partition function for a system consiting of ##N## distinguishable and noninteracting particles with single particle partition function ##z## (prove this from first principle, good exercise).

Thus, in your case where the single particle partition function is given by $$z = 1 + 2e^{-\beta\Delta} + 2e^{-4\beta\Delta}.$$ The partition function for a mole of distinguishable and noninteracting particles is therefore $$Z = \big(1 + 2e^{-\beta\Delta} + 2e^{-4\beta\Delta}\big)^{N_A}$$
and the internal energy becomes \begin{align*}U &= -\frac{\partial}{\partial\beta}\log Z \\ &= 2N_A\Delta\frac{e^{-\beta\Delta}+4e^{-4\beta\Delta}}{1+2e^{-\beta\Delta}+2e^{-4\beta\Delta}}.\end{align*}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danyull
William Crawford said:
In general, $$Z=z^N$$ is the partition function for a system consiting of ##N## distinguishable and noninteracting particles with single particle partition function ##z## (prove this from first principle, good exercise).
Ah I remember this now! This also reminds me that I should study up on distinguishable and indistinguishable particles too. Thanks a bunch!
 
If the particles are indistinguishable, which is probably the case here, Z = zN/(N!). But when you take logs and then differentiate, the N! disappears.
 
mjc123 said:
If the particles are indistinguishable, which is probably the case here, Z = zN/(N!). But when you take logs and then differentiate, the N! disappears.
No, this is generally not true for indistinguishable particles as the following minimal example will demonstrate.

Consider a system consisting of two particles, each of which can be in one out of two possible one-particle-states with the energies ##E_1 = 0## and ##E_2 = \epsilon## respectively.

Case 1 (distinguishable and noninteracting particles)
The single-particle partition function is in this case given by \begin{align}z = 1 + e^{-\beta\epsilon}\end{align} and the total partition function is \begin{align}Z_\text{dist} &= 1 + 2e^{-\beta\epsilon} + e^{-2\beta\epsilon} \nonumber\\ &= \big(1+e^{-\beta\epsilon}\big)^2 \\ &= z^2\nonumber\end{align} as expected.

Case 2 (indistinguishable bosons)
The single-particle partition function is still given by (1). However, this time, the total partition function given by \begin{align}Z_\text{bosons} &= 1 + e^{-\beta\epsilon} + e^{-2\beta\epsilon} \nonumber\\ &\neq \frac{z^2}{2} \\ &= \frac{1}{2} + e^{-\beta\epsilon} + \frac{1}{2}e^{-2\beta\epsilon}\nonumber\end{align} as otherwise claimed.

Case 3 (indistinguishable fermions)
Likewise is the single-particle partition function also given (1). However, this is the total partition function given as \begin{align}Z_\text{fermions} &= e^{-\beta\epsilon} \nonumber\\ &\neq \frac{z^2}{2} \\ &= \frac{1}{2} + e^{-\beta\epsilon} + \frac{1}{2}e^{-2\beta\epsilon}.\nonumber\end{align}

Conclusion: Neither ##Z_\text{bosons}## nor ##Z_\text{fermions}## satisfy ##z^2/2##.

EDIT: Three pictures illustrating the above three cases.
picture1.png


picture2.png


picture3.png
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K