I Interpretation of "pseudo-diagonalisation"

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter jk22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interpretation
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
I wanted to know what the usage of the following could be :

Let ##A\in M_{n\times n}(K)## a matrix over the field K.

Suppose we look for ##x,\lambda\in M_{n\times 1}(K)## such that

$$Ax=(\lambda_i x_i)$$

Hence instead of having a global eigenvalue we would have local ones.

I know the characteristic polynomial gives a relationship between the components of ##\lambda##.What results are known about this problem, and can they have interpretations like quantum mechanics has with usual diagonalisation ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems that this would hold for some ##\lambda## for any ##x## with all non-zero elements.
 
  • Like
Likes jk22 and Infrared
$$\exists x\neq 0$$
 
##\lambda_i = [Ax]_i/x_i## will always work as long as ##x_i \ne 0 \forall i##. Allowing different values for the ##\lambda_i## makes this property too easy to be significant.
 
  • Like
Likes jk22
So what if the condition that the ##\lambda## shall be independent of the ##x## were added ?
 
If the ##\lambda_i## are given, define ##\Lambda## to be the diagonal matrix with the ##\lambda_i## on the diagonal. Then your equation is equivalent to ##Ax=\Lambda x.## Another way of saying this is that ##x## is in the nullspace of ##A-\Lambda##.

Note that if all of the ##\lambda_i=\lambda## are equal then your question is the same as finding the ##\lambda##-eigenspace of ##A##. This agrees with the above because the ##\lambda##-eigenspace of a matrix ##A## is the nullspace of ##A-\lambda I##, and ##\Lambda=\lambda I## in this case.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top