Interpretation of the rating of a real transformer

AI Thread Summary
The rating of the transformer indicates that the primary voltage is 2300 V and the secondary voltage is 230 V. When using the equivalent circuit equation, Vp should be taken as 2300 V and Vs as 230 V. There is a convention in transformer specifications that typically lists primary voltage first, followed by secondary voltage. In practical applications, stepping up from 230 V to 2300 V is uncommon and would be explicitly stated in specifications if necessary. Understanding these voltage ratings is crucial for accurate calculations in power engineering.
arpansen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The rating of a real transformer is 15 kVA , 2300/230-V then can we say that the primary rms is 2300 V or can we say that the secondary rms is 230 V or both.

To clarify further, suppose to solve for certain characteristics of this transformer like primary current and secondary current i use the equivalent circuit equation of the transformer referred to the primary side as:

Vp = aVs + Req*Ip + jXeq*Ip

Then what should i use for Vp or Vs in the above equation looking at the rating of the transformer.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi arpansen, welcome to the famous Physics Forums! :approve:

The primary would be 2300V and the secondary 230V. Possibly (though I'm not certain) there may be a convention that the specification follows the form primary:secondary. It would be logical to have such a convention, anyway. :wink:

In practice, I can't think of a case where a power utility would need to step up from 230 to 2300. In the event of such a rare need, I'm sure this would be clearly spelled out in the specs.

Power engineering is a very pragmatic field. You can work on the basis there's no one trying to trip you up. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Usually.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top