Interpreting 2-D FFTs of images

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hyo X
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images
Hyo X
Messages
101
Reaction score
11
I have electron microscope images of structures of varying periodicity, ranging from highly crystalline to highly amorphous. It is relatively straightforward to take FFTs of these images, but what i want to do is extract a quantitative value to characterize crystallinity and compare it between samples.

The easier question is, what kind of information can I extract from 2D FFTs about the structures?

The more difficult question is: how can I quantitatively compare FFTs between different images?

I have some ideas, but would appreciate suggestions. These are two example FFTs.

Image1
116A_33Hex_01_FFT.jpg

---
Image 2
116C_33IPA_30_FFT.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The more highly ordered the structure, the better defined the Fourier peaks, so you can conclude for example that the lower image is from a more amorphous structure (though there is a slight amount of order due to the "ghost" rings on the y-axis).

The FT will also tell you what sort of symmetry is present - e.g. sixfold symmetry typically indicates a hexagonal-packed structure. The number of visible harmonics indicates the "fidelity" of the symmetry.

When comparing FFTs, be sure to normalise the integrated power.

What are your ideas? Presumably you have access to the actual (non Fourier-Transformed) images.

Claude.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top