- 4,796
- 32
I got this HW question made up by the professor that I find ambiguous. It says
Consider the curve \theta (t)=\pi/2-t, \phi(t)=\log \cot(\pi/4-t/2) on the sphere r(\theta,\phi)=(\sin\theta \cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,cos\theta)
Find the length of the curve btw the points t=pi/6 and pi/4
He did not specify domains for either the curve nor the "surface" r. On one hand, if we take r to be a surface patch, this requires that the (maximum) domain be 0 < \theta < \pi, 0 < \phi < 2\pi. Anything bigger and the domain is not open or r is not injective. But this surface patch does not cover the whole sphere.
I could also consider two other surface patches of the form r_{2,3}(\theta,\phi)=(\sin\theta \cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,cos\theta) with appropriate domains, that together with r above form an atlas for the unit sphere.
Any thoughts? How would you interpret this question?
Consider the curve \theta (t)=\pi/2-t, \phi(t)=\log \cot(\pi/4-t/2) on the sphere r(\theta,\phi)=(\sin\theta \cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,cos\theta)
Find the length of the curve btw the points t=pi/6 and pi/4
He did not specify domains for either the curve nor the "surface" r. On one hand, if we take r to be a surface patch, this requires that the (maximum) domain be 0 < \theta < \pi, 0 < \phi < 2\pi. Anything bigger and the domain is not open or r is not injective. But this surface patch does not cover the whole sphere.
I could also consider two other surface patches of the form r_{2,3}(\theta,\phi)=(\sin\theta \cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,cos\theta) with appropriate domains, that together with r above form an atlas for the unit sphere.
Any thoughts? How would you interpret this question?
Last edited: