Intersection of ellipses and equivalent problems

Gerenuk
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
5
Does anyone know how to determine whether two ellipses intersect? I don't need the precise points but rather only the answer whether there are points. All my attempts led to 4th order polynomials, which are heavy to solve, but considering that I don't need the actual points I assume there must be an easier way.

Some guy claims it's doable
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/htdocs/dcforum/DCForumID6/710.shtml

Here are some equivalent problems which have to be solved for the angles (which however I can't solve either...)
\cos\phi+a\sin\theta=x
\sin\phi+b\cos\theta=y
or even
\Re(e^{i\theta}(1+ze^{i\theta}))=q
where z is complex, is an equivalent problem. Any ideas?

My best attempt so far was using discriminants, but it's messy and I made a mistake somewhere...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would eliminate the angles by squaring and write the equations in Cartesian coordinates. Then we have still a quadratic equation in two variables, which one can be normalized by a coordinate transformation, such that we end up with ##y=\pm \frac{b}{a}\sqrt{a^2-x^2}## with one of the two ellipsis. This can be substituted into the other equation, such that we have only one equation in ##x##. It is probably easiest to determine it numerically by one the tools available on the internet.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top