Intiutive approach to Green's function for SE

gulsen
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Griffiths develops an intelgral equation for Scrödinger equation in his QM book. As doing so, he requires Green's function for Helmholtz equation

<br /> (k^2 + \nabla^2) G( \mathbf r) = \delta^3(\mathbf r)<br />

A rigourious series of steps, including Fourier transforms and residue integrals follow immidiately. As it turns out, the Green's function is independent of direction of \mathbf r, i.e. G(\mathbf r) = G(r). Does anyone know a trick deducing this condition without actually finding the Green's function. The importance to prove is that, it turns out that there's a relatively simple solution if we assume G(\mathbf r) = G(r))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This simpler form of the GF is caused by a space-invariance of the potential.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top