Intro physics proportion question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the proportional size of a hydrogen atom when a proton is scaled up to the size of a marble. The user initially calculated the hydrogen atom's size to be 300 meters based on the scaling factor derived from the marble's radius. However, they seek clarification on how to properly set up the ratio to demonstrate that the hydrogen atom is consistently 50,000 times larger than the proton. The response emphasizes that the problem relies on proportional scaling using the known radii of both the proton and hydrogen atom. Understanding this ratio is key to accurately determining the enlarged size of the hydrogen atom.
dylanhouse
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The radius of a proton is roughly 10^-15m, while the radius of a hydrogen atom is about 0.5x10^-10m. If we were to enlarge both proportionally until the proton was as large as a marble, about how large would the atom be?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated an answer of 300m, but this doesn't seem correct for the size of a Hydrogen atom. I simply took the radius of a marble to be approximately 0.6cm, found the proton had to increase by 6x10^12 to become the size of the marble and multiplied this increase factor by the radius of the hydrogen atom and got 300 :$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The proportion looks okay. The straightforward approach is to set up the ratios as an equation.

$$\frac{r_{hydrogen}}{r_{proton}} = \frac{r_x}{r_{marble}}$$
 
What is rx? I'd have (0.5x10^-10)/(10^-15)=rx/x? Assume the marble radius is x..
 
##r_x## is the unknown radius of the "inflated" atom.
 
I guess my question is how would I use that ratio to show that the atom is always 50,000 times larger than proton?
 
dylanhouse said:
I guess my question is how would I use that ratio to show that the atom is always 50,000 times larger than proton?

The ratio is a given. You have the radius of the proton, and the radius of the hydrogen atom. The rest is just proportional scaling (or comparison) of sizes.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top