Intro Quantum: Expanding infinite square well

camron_m21
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Griffiths Intro to Quantum, problem 2.38:
A particle of mass m is in the ground state of the infinite square well. Suddenly the well expands to twice its original size: the right wall moving from a to 2a, leaving the wave function (momentarily) undisturbed. The energy of the particle is now measured.



Homework Equations



c_{n} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\int^{a}_{0} sin(\frac{n\pi}{a} x) \Psi (x,0) dx


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the particle starts out in the ground state in a well of length a, at t=0 (right when the well expands) the wave function should be

\Psi (x,0) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} sin\left( \frac{\pi x}{a} \right)

I know this can be written as a sum of the new wave functions,

\Psi(x,0) = \sum c_{n} \psi_{n} (x)

The problem wants the most probable result of measuring the energy, as well as the next most probable. For this, I was thinking of using |c_{n}|^{2} as the probability of getting an energy. However, when I do this, I get pi times an integer as the argument for the sine in the answer, which gives me zero.

I'm mostly just at a loss on how to start on this, so any help would be appreciated. I'm not sure what I need to calculate to find the most and next most probable energies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scratch that, I figured it out. For anyone else stuck on this, calculate c_{n} the regular way, but use [0,a] for the integration bounds rather than [0,2a], since the initial function at t=0 is 0 for x > a.
 
Are you using your expression for cn above? It's not quite correct for this particular problem because it's using the eigenstates for the original well, not the expanded well.
 
Yeah, sorry about that, that was just the formula for the general infinite square well. The formula I used replaces a with 2a, except in the t=0 function.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top