Intro Quantum: Expanding infinite square well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem from Griffiths regarding a particle in an infinite square well that suddenly expands to twice its size. The initial wave function is identified as the ground state, and the challenge is to determine the most probable energy measurements after the expansion. Participants clarify that the coefficients for the new wave functions must be calculated using the original well's bounds, as the wave function remains zero outside the original limits. There is a consensus on the need to adjust the integration bounds for calculating the coefficients correctly. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the appropriate eigenstates for the expanded well to derive accurate results.
camron_m21
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Griffiths Intro to Quantum, problem 2.38:
A particle of mass m is in the ground state of the infinite square well. Suddenly the well expands to twice its original size: the right wall moving from a to 2a, leaving the wave function (momentarily) undisturbed. The energy of the particle is now measured.



Homework Equations



c_{n} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\int^{a}_{0} sin(\frac{n\pi}{a} x) \Psi (x,0) dx


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the particle starts out in the ground state in a well of length a, at t=0 (right when the well expands) the wave function should be

\Psi (x,0) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} sin\left( \frac{\pi x}{a} \right)

I know this can be written as a sum of the new wave functions,

\Psi(x,0) = \sum c_{n} \psi_{n} (x)

The problem wants the most probable result of measuring the energy, as well as the next most probable. For this, I was thinking of using |c_{n}|^{2} as the probability of getting an energy. However, when I do this, I get pi times an integer as the argument for the sine in the answer, which gives me zero.

I'm mostly just at a loss on how to start on this, so any help would be appreciated. I'm not sure what I need to calculate to find the most and next most probable energies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scratch that, I figured it out. For anyone else stuck on this, calculate c_{n} the regular way, but use [0,a] for the integration bounds rather than [0,2a], since the initial function at t=0 is 0 for x > a.
 
Are you using your expression for cn above? It's not quite correct for this particular problem because it's using the eigenstates for the original well, not the expanded well.
 
Yeah, sorry about that, that was just the formula for the general infinite square well. The formula I used replaces a with 2a, except in the t=0 function.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top