Intro to Limit: Infinity & Zero Cases

vissh
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Introductory "Limit"

hello :D Started to study calculus and was on "limits". I got a little doubt :D
When the value of any limit approaches to Infinity.i.e when the numerator have a non zero number but the denominator gets a zero on putting the variable's value , is it called that the limit doesn't exist??
For eg , can u tell me what is value of following :-
1) limx->2- x/(x-2)
2) limx->2+ x/(x-2)
3) limx->0 3/x
4) limx->5+ 6/(x-5)
5) limx->5- 6/(x-5)

Know that's very basic But if u know pls guide ^.^
Thanks in advance (^_^)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It would help a lot if you could tell us what you think the answers are. And it would help even more if you could tell us why you think they are the answers...
 


hmm.ok this is what i think:- [I using "a" to represent infinity]
1)As x->2 from left side , (x-2) will be a very small -ve number and thus, its reciprocal will get a very big absolute value i.e. its -a[-infinity]and thus -a*(no.close to 2) = -a.
so,for this left handed limit my answer is -a[-infinity] and left handed limit exists.

2)As x->2 from right side , (x-2) will be a very small +ve number and thus, its reciprocal will get a very big absolute value i.e. its +a[+infinity]and thus +a*(no.close to 2) = +a.
so,for this left handed limit my answer is +a[+infinity] and right handed limit exists.

As 1 and 2 have different answers ,thus, limx->2 x/(x-2) doesn't exist.

3)Using same argument as above , the left handed limit will give -a and the right handed will give +a And thus , the right and left handed limit exists. But the books says these doesn't exist as the denominator approaches 0 while numerator doesn't .

So, can u clear it out for me now as i think u will get where i am getting wrong :)
 


All these limits are correct!
You do need to distinguish between "the limit exists" and "the limit is infinity". If the limit is + or - infinity, then the limit doesn't exist (even if the left and right hand limits are equal).
The only way for a limit to exist, is if left and right hand limits are equal and they are a real number. So, technically, an infinite limit doesn't exist. That's what the book is trying to say...
 


okz Understood :D Thanks a lot Micro (^.^) One last thing to ask .
Suppose we got a limit limx->a f(x)
And f(x) is a function which have a term in its denominator which gets 0 when we put the value of a and this term can't be removed , do we find the limit by using the method i used ?
Thanks again :)

Edit :- okzzz ^.^
 
Last edited:


Yes, your method is always the right one. Except when you're in a "0/0"-situation (i.e. if both the numerator and denumerator is 0).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top