Courses Intro to Philosophy: Knowledge and Reality or Philosophy: Practical Logic?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between two introductory courses for a physics major: an Intro course with two lectures and a seminar weekly, and a Practical Logic course with a three-hour lecture once a week. Participants emphasize the importance of the professors teaching these courses, suggesting that the quality of the instructor can significantly influence the learning experience. They recommend using platforms like RateMyProfessor to assess potential professors, but also caution about biases in reviews, noting that negative feedback may come from disgruntled students while positive experiences might go unreported. Concerns are raised about the reliability of such review sites, including the potential for trolling by individuals who haven't taken the courses. Overall, the consensus is that the choice of course should consider both the content and the teaching quality.
JoshGuthrie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Which course do you guys think would be more interesting/helpful for a physics major? They are both 100 level, Intro consists of two lectures and a seminar a week, and Practical Logic consists of a three hour lecture once a week.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whichever has the most writing.
 
  • Like
Likes JoshGuthrie
Both sound like classes that could be potentially interesting.

What I would do is less focus on the class descriptions, and more focus on who the professors are going to be. Go to ratemyprofessor and see what the professors will be like.
 
  • Like
Likes JoshGuthrie
quickquestion said:
Both sound like classes that could be potentially interesting.

What I would do is less focus on the class descriptions, and more focus on who the professors are going to be. Go to ratemyprofessor and see what the professors will be like.

I second this. Philosophy courses are either some of the most interesting courses you will take, or the most boring and useless. The deciding factor is the professor.
 
  • Like
Likes StatGuy2000, JoshGuthrie and Evo
Logic. It is sorely lacking in undergraduates.
 
  • Like
Likes JoshGuthrie
Dishsoap said:
I second this. Philosophy courses are either some of the most interesting courses you will take, or the most boring and useless. The deciding factor is the professor.

I agree with this, and not just for philosophy classes, but all humanities classes. The value of such courses is highly dependent on the professor.

However, there is a caveat -- one of the issues with sites like ratemyprofessor is that there may be a potential bias involved in terms of the types of responses that "students" enter. Students who may have an axe to grind against a professor (say, for giving a grade that the student may deem unfair, no matter how justified the professor's actions may be), will be disproportionately likely to judge the professor on the site negatively, whereas students who have had a positive experience may not necessarily be inclined to respond as such.

Furthermore, how does sites like ratemyprofessor prevent trolling among supposed "students" who have not taken a class with a given professor (or who may not even be enrolled in the college/university)? These issues may be lessened if there are multiple reviews of a given professor, but not entirely.
 
  • Like
Likes JoshGuthrie
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top